Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 17;13(45):53986-53995.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c16214. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

Li+ Dynamics of Liquid Electrolytes Nanoconfined in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Affiliations

Li+ Dynamics of Liquid Electrolytes Nanoconfined in Metal-Organic Frameworks

Marco Farina et al. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. .

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are excellent platforms to design hybrid electrolytes for Li batteries with liquid-like transport and stability against lithium dendrites. We report on Li+ dynamics in quasi-solid electrolytes consisting in Mg-MOF-74 soaked with LiClO4-propylene carbonate (PC) and LiClO4-ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) solutions by combining studies of ion conductivity, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization, and spin relaxometry. We investigate nanoconfinement of liquid inside MOFs to characterize the adsorption/solvation mechanism at the basis of Li+ migration in these materials. NMR supports that the liquid is nanoconfined in framework micropores, strongly interacting with their walls and that the nature of the solvent affects Li+ migration in MOFs. Contrary to the "free'' liquid electrolytes, faster ion dynamics and higher Li+ mobility take place in LiClO4-PC electrolytes when nanoconfined in MOFs demonstrating superionic conductor behavior (conductivity σrt > 0.1 mS cm-1, transport number tLi+ > 0.7). Such properties, including a more stable Li electrodeposition, make MOF-hybrid electrolytes promising for high-power and safer lithium-ion batteries.

Keywords: dendrites; lithium-ion batteries; metal−organic frameworks; nanoconfinement; quasi-solid electrolytes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Crystal structure of Mg-MOF-74, showing the hexagonal channels formed by Mg (blue) and the dhtp linker (carbons in gray, oxygens in red, and hydrogens omitted for clarity), running parallel to the crystallographic c axis. (b) Arrhenius plots of the ionic conductivity for the LiClO4-PC and LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 quasi-solid electrolytes. (c) Li plating/stripping behavior of Li//Li symmetric cells with different electrolytes; black line: liquid LiClO4–PC 2.0M and red line: quasi-solid LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) 6Li MAS NMR spectra for LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 (black) and LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 (red). Experimental spectra, spectral deconvolution, and simulated spectra are shown with full, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively. (b) Temperature dependence of 7Li static NMR line width for LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 (black) and LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 (red). The Li+ jump rates τ–1 were determined by the dashed lines, which identify the temperature of the inflection point of the sigmoidal regression curve and NMR line width. A summary of the output of these fits is shown in Table S2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Arrhenius plots of the 7Li NMR SLR in the laboratory frame (T1–1) at ω0/2π = 156 MHz and in the rotating frame (T–1) at ω1/2π = 20, 33, and 50 kHz for (a) LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 (blue) and (b) LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 (red). The temperature range used to determine activation barriers Ea is represented by black dotted lines.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Arrhenius plot of Li+ jump rates τ –1 obtained from 7Li NMR line width plot and NMR SLR measurements for LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 (black) and LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 (red). The jump rates were extracted from the line narrowing experiments in Figure 2b and the position of the maxima in the temperature dependency of the SLR rates T1–1 and T–1 data in Figure 3.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Chemical structures of (a) linker and (b) PC, EC, and DMC electrolytes. 2D 1H–13C HETCOR NMR spectra for (c) LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 and (d) LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 using a long CP contact time of 1 ms. Signals for the linker, PC, EC, and DMC are labeled in black, orange, red, and blue, respectively. The spectra for LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 and LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 show typical correlations for EC (in red), DMC (in blue), PC (in orange), and the MOF organic linker (in black). The extra correlations observed in these spectra versus the one obtained with a shorter CP contact time of 50 μs (Figure S12) are given in green to emphasize close proximity between the solvent and MOF linker (Figure S13), suggesting absorption into the pores. In the 13C direct dimension of the HETCOR, 13C CP MAS spectra of Mg-MOF-74, LiClO4-PC@MgMOF74 [(in panel (c)], and LiClO4-EC-DMC@MgMOF74 [in panel (d)], simulated (dashed gray lines) and deconvoluted spectra (gray lines) are given and show the shifts in the NMR signals of most carbons in the organic linker versus pure, thermally activated Mg-MOF-74. In the 1H indirect dimension, a comparison of the 1H one pulse spectra of Mg-MOF-74, the quasi-solid electrolytes (full lines), and the internal projections of the HETCOR (dashed gray lines) is provided from left to right. The asterisk (*) denotes the spinning sideband.

References

    1. Furukawa H.; Cordova K. E.; O’Keeffe M.; Yaghi O. M. The Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444.10.1126/science.1230444. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) can be found under http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk. 03 March 2021.
    1. Moghadam P. Z.; Li A.; Liu X.-W.; Bueno-Perez R.; Wang S.-D.; Wiggin S. B.; Wood P. A.; Fairen-Jimenez D. Targeted classification of metal–organic frameworks in the Cambridge structural database (CSD). Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 8373–8387. 10.1039/d0sc01297a. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farha O. K.; Eryazici I.; Jeong N. C.; Hauser B. G.; Wilmer C. E.; Sarjeant A. A.; Snurr R. Q.; Nguyen S. T.; Yazaydın A. Ö.; Hupp J. T. Metal–Organic Framework Materials with Ultrahigh Surface Areas: Is the Sky the Limit?. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15016–15021. 10.1021/ja3055639. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slater A. G.; Cooper A. I. Function-led design of new porous materials. Science 2015, 348, aaa8075.10.1126/science.aaa8075. - DOI - PubMed