Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2022 Feb;302(2):284-285.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021212092. Epub 2021 Nov 9.

A Warning about Warning Signals for Interpreting Mammograms

Solveig Hofvind  1 , Christoph I Lee  1
Affiliations
Editorial

A Warning about Warning Signals for Interpreting Mammograms

Solveig Hofvind et al. Radiology. 2022 Feb.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: S.H. No relevant relationships. C.I.L. Textbook royalties from McGraw Hill, Oxford University Press, Wolters Kluwer; personal fees for journal editorial board work for American College of Radiology; personal fees for work on Data Safety Monitoring Board for GRAIL.

Figures

Dr Hofvind is head of BreastScreen Norway and professor at the University of Tromsø, Faculty of Health Sciences. Her main interests are the quality assurance, evaluation, and techniques and strategies used to improve mammographic screening.
Dr Hofvind is head of BreastScreen Norway and professor at the University of Tromsø, Faculty of Health Sciences. Her main interests are the quality assurance, evaluation, and techniques and strategies used to improve mammographic screening.
Dr Lee is professor of radiology, adjunct professor of health systems and population health, and director of the Northwest Screening and Cancer Outcomes Research Enterprise at the University of Washington. He is a practicing breast imager with a research program focused on emerging breast cancer screening technology assessment.
Dr Lee is professor of radiology, adjunct professor of health systems and population health, and director of the Northwest Screening and Cancer Outcomes Research Enterprise at the University of Washington. He is a practicing breast imager with a research program focused on emerging breast cancer screening technology assessment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment on

References

    1. Smith-Bindman R , Ballard-Barbash R , Miglioretti DL , Patnick J , Kerlikowske K . Comparing the performance of mammography screening in the USA and the UK . J Med Screen 2005. ; 12 ( 1 ): 50 – 54 . - PubMed
    1. Chan HP , Samala RK , Hadjiiski LM . CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges . Br J Radiol 2020. ; 93 ( 1108 ): 20190580 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Le EPV , Wang Y , Huang Y , Hickman S , Gilbert FJ . Artificial intelligence in breast imaging . Clin Radiol 2019. ; 74 ( 5 ): 357 – 366 . - PubMed
    1. Geertse TD , Setz-Pels W , van der Waal D , et al. . Added value of prereading screening mammograms for breast cancer by radiologic technologists on early screening outcomes . Radiology 2021. . 10.1148/radiol.2021210746. Published online November 9, 2021 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lehman CD , Wellman RD , Buist DS , et al. . Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection . JAMA Intern Med 2015. ; 175 ( 11 ): 1828 – 1837 . - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources