Abnormal Findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP:" An Effective Boolean Interpretation Model in Discriminating Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Control Group
- PMID: 34754594
- PMCID: PMC8571256
- DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_158_2021
Abnormal Findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP:" An Effective Boolean Interpretation Model in Discriminating Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Control Group
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of findings on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) separately and to identify an optimal Boolean interpretation model for discriminating patients with small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from control groups in clinical practice.
Material and methods: We retrospectively enrolled 30 patients with surgery confirmed small PDAC (≤20 mm) and 302 patients without pancreatic abnormality between April 2008 and February 2020. The presence of masses was evaluated by T1WI, T2WI, and DWI. Abnormality of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was evaluated by T2WI and MRCP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to select significant sequences for discriminating the small PDAC and control groups. Boolean operators "OR" or "AND" were used to construct sequence combinations. Diagnostic performances of these sequences and combinations were evaluated by X 2 tests.
Results: The sensitivity of T2WI was lowest (20%) for detecting masses. For evaluating MPD abnormality, sensitivity was higher for MRCP than for T2WI (86.7% vs. 53.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that T1WI and DWI for detecting the presence of masses and MRCP for evaluating MPD abnormality were significantly associated with differentiation between the two groups (P = 0.0002, P = 0.0484, and P < 0.0001, respectively). Seven combinations were constructed with T1WI, DWI, and MRCP. The combination of findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP" achieved the highest sensitivity of 96.7% and negative predictive value of 99.6%.
Conclusion: The combination of findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP" might be an optimal interpretation model for discriminating small PDAC from control groups in clinical practice.
Keywords: Boolean operators; Early diagnosis; Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Screening.
© 2021 Published by Scientific Scholar on behalf of Journal of Clinical Imaging Science.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Park HJ, Jang KM, Song KD, Kim SH, Kim YK, Cha MJ, et al. Value of unenhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for detection of primary small (=20 mm) solid pancreatic tumours and prediction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:1076–84. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley JW, Kamel I, et al. international cancer of the pancreas screening (CAPS) consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013;62:339–47. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous