Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 12:11:54.
doi: 10.25259/JCIS_158_2021. eCollection 2021.

Abnormal Findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP:" An Effective Boolean Interpretation Model in Discriminating Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Control Group

Affiliations

Abnormal Findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP:" An Effective Boolean Interpretation Model in Discriminating Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma from Control Group

Hainan Ren et al. J Clin Imaging Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of findings on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) separately and to identify an optimal Boolean interpretation model for discriminating patients with small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from control groups in clinical practice.

Material and methods: We retrospectively enrolled 30 patients with surgery confirmed small PDAC (≤20 mm) and 302 patients without pancreatic abnormality between April 2008 and February 2020. The presence of masses was evaluated by T1WI, T2WI, and DWI. Abnormality of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was evaluated by T2WI and MRCP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to select significant sequences for discriminating the small PDAC and control groups. Boolean operators "OR" or "AND" were used to construct sequence combinations. Diagnostic performances of these sequences and combinations were evaluated by X 2 tests.

Results: The sensitivity of T2WI was lowest (20%) for detecting masses. For evaluating MPD abnormality, sensitivity was higher for MRCP than for T2WI (86.7% vs. 53.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that T1WI and DWI for detecting the presence of masses and MRCP for evaluating MPD abnormality were significantly associated with differentiation between the two groups (P = 0.0002, P = 0.0484, and P < 0.0001, respectively). Seven combinations were constructed with T1WI, DWI, and MRCP. The combination of findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP" achieved the highest sensitivity of 96.7% and negative predictive value of 99.6%.

Conclusion: The combination of findings on "T1WI or DWI or MRCP" might be an optimal interpretation model for discriminating small PDAC from control groups in clinical practice.

Keywords: Boolean operators; Early diagnosis; Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
A 63-year-old man diagnosed with pancreatic ductal carcinoma by ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. T1-weighted imaging shows a mass with low signal intensity in the pancreatic body (arrow) (a). T2-weighted imaging shows a mass in the pancreatic body (arrow) (b). Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value 800 s/mm2) shows a mass with high signal intensity in the pancreatic body (arrow) (c). Mild dilatation of the main pancreatic duct in the pancreatic tail (arrow) (d). The maximum intensity projection image of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography shows abrupt cutoff of the main pancreatic duct (arrow) with dilatation of the upstream main pancreatic duct and side branches (e).

References

    1. Tsuchiya R, Tajima Y, Matsuzaki S, Onizuka S, Kanematsu T. Early pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2001;1:597–603. doi: 10.1159/000055869. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsuchiya R, Tomioka T, Izawa K, Noda T, Yamamoto K, Tsunoda T, et al. Collective review of small carcinomas of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1986;203:77–81. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198601000-00013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park HJ, Jang KM, Song KD, Kim SH, Kim YK, Cha MJ, et al. Value of unenhanced MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging for detection of primary small (=20 mm) solid pancreatic tumours and prediction of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:1076–84. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canto MI, Harinck F, Hruban RH, Offerhaus GJ, Poley JW, Kamel I, et al. international cancer of the pancreas screening (CAPS) consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2013;62:339–47. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harinck F, Konings IC, Kluijt I, Poley JW, van Hooft JE, van Dullemen HM, et al. A multicentre comparative prospective blinded analysis of EUS and MRI for screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals. Gut. 2016;65:1505–13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308008. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources