Acute changes in mitral valve geometry after percutaneous valve repair with MitraClip XTR by three-dimensional echocardiography
- PMID: 34755379
- DOI: 10.1111/echo.15238
Acute changes in mitral valve geometry after percutaneous valve repair with MitraClip XTR by three-dimensional echocardiography
Abstract
Background: Mitral valve (MV) repair with MitraClip system is a safe treatment option for high-risk patients with significant mitral regurgitation (MR). We aimed to characterize, by three-dimensional echocardiography (3D-E), changes occurring in MV after implantation of third generation MitraClip XTR device, with specific reference to the underlying MR mechanism (functional vs degenerative, FMR vs DMR).
Methods: We prospectively enrolled 59 patients, who underwent intra-procedural 3D-E before and after device deployment. Three-D datasets were analyzed off-line, using a dedicated semiautomatic software, to obtain parametric quantification of mitral anatomy.
Results: Post-procedural MR of mild or lesser degree was achieved in 40 patients (68%), with no differences between FMR and DMR (p 0.9). After MitraClip XTR implantation, the FMR group experienced an immediate annular resizing, with reduction of antero-posterior diameter (p 0.024) and sphericity index (p 0.017), next to a recovery of physiological saddle-shape, defined by lower non-planar angle (p ≤0.001) and higher annulus height to commissural width ratio (p ≤0.001). On the opposite, the DMR group revealed a significant decrease of maximum annular velocity (p 0.027), addressing a mechanic effect of the device deployment. Finally, baseline anterior mitral leaflet angle was found as an independent predictor of acute procedural result (OR 6.7, [CI 1.01-44.33], p 0.049).
Conclusions: MitraClip XTR implantation acts in restoring the original mitral geometry, with distinctive effects according to MR mechanism. Three-D parametric quantification of MV sheds new light on changes occurring in the valvular apparatus, and helps identifying possible new predictors of acute procedural success.
Keywords: 3D echocardiography; MitraClip procedure; mitral annulus; mitral valve quantification.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739-2786.
-
- Feldman T, Kar S, Elmariah S, et al. Randomized comparison of percutaneous repair and surgery for mitral regurgitation 5-year results of EVEREST II. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(25):2844-2854.
-
- Fail PS, Smalling RW, Ph D, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(15):1395-1406.
-
- Remy T, Bertog SC, Wunderlich N, et al. Change in mitral annular size and geometry after mitraclip® implantation in patients with functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27(5):516-524.
-
- Al Amri I, Debonnaire P, Van Der Kley F, et al. Acute effect of MitraClip implantation on mitral valve geometry in patients with functional mitral regurgitation: insights from three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography. EuroIntervention. 2016;11(13):1554-1561.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources