Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 8;36(9):e360903.
doi: 10.1590/ACB360903. eCollection 2021.

Ischemic perconditioning on mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

Affiliations

Ischemic perconditioning on mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats

Lainy Carollyne da Costa Cavalcante et al. Acta Cir Bras. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate if the perconditioning affects the antioxidant capacity in mesenteric ischemia and reperfusion injury.

Methods: Twenty-one Wistar rats were assigned into three groups, as follows: Sham, IR and rPER. The animals were subjected to mesenteric ischemia for 30 min. rPER consisted of three cycles of 5-min hindlimb ischemia followed by 5 min hindlimb perfusion at the same time to mesenteric ischemic period. After 5 minutes, blood and 5 cm of terminal ileum were harvested for thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) measurement.

Results: rPER technique was able to reduce intestinal tissue TBARS levels (p<0.0001), but no statistic difference was observed in blood levels between groups, although it was verified similar results in rPER and Sham group. rPER technique also enhanced TEAC levels in both blood (p = 0.0314) and intestinal tissue (p = 0.0139), compared to IR group.

Conclusions: rPER appears as the most promising technique to avoid IR injury. This technique reduced TBARS levels in blood and intestinal tissue and promoted the maintenance of antioxidant defense in mesenteric acute injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental design. Sham group was not submitted to ischemic conditioning.
Figure 2
Figure 2. TBARS blood levels (ng/mL) according to groups. Analysis of variance (Tukey post hoc test).
Figure 3
Figure 3. TEAC blood levels (mMol/L) according to groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4. TBARS intestinal tissue levels (ng/mL) according to groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5. TEAC intestinal tissue levels (mMol/L) according to groups.

Similar articles

References

    1. Chen G, Thakkar M, Robinson C, Doré S. Limb remote ischemic conditioning: mechanisms, anesthetics, and the potential for expanding therapeutic options. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1–18. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Glorieux C, Zamocky M, Sandoval J, Verrax J, Calderon PB. Regulation of catalase expression in healthy and cancerous cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;87:84–97. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mccafferty K, Forbes S, Thiemermann C, Yaqoob M. The challenge of translating ischemic conditioning from animal models to humans: the role of comorbidities. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7:1321–1333. doi: 10.1242/dmm.016741. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yamamoto S, Tanabe M, Wakabayashi G, Shimazu M, Matsumoto K, Kitajima M. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1 beta in ischemia-reperfusion injury of the rat small intestine. J Surg Res. 2001;99:134–141. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clair DG, Beach JM. Mesenteric ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:959–968. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1503884. - DOI - PubMed