Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;36(2):303-315.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-03012-9. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Effects of individualized positive end-expiratory pressure combined with recruitment maneuver on intraoperative ventilation during abdominal surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Xiang Li et al. J Anesth. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Low tidal volume ventilation strategy may lead to atelectasis without proper positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM) settings. RM followed by individualized PEEP was a new method to optimize the intraoperative pulmonary function. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to compare the effects of individualized PEEP + RM on intraoperative pulmonary function and hemodynamic with other PEEP and RM settings. The primary outcomes were intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance, while the secondary outcomes were intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure. In total, we identified 15 clinical trials containing 36 randomized groups with 3634 participants. Ventilation strategies were divided into eight groups by four PEEP (L: low, M: moderate, H: high, and I: individualized) and two RM (yes or no) settings. The main results showed that IPEEP + RM group was superior to all other groups regarding to both oxygenation index and dynamic compliance. LPEEP group was inferior to LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, and IPEEP + RM in terms of oxygenation index and LPEEP + RM, MPEEP, MPEEP + RM, HPEEP + RM, IPEEP, and IPEEP + RM in terms of dynamic compliance. All comparisons were similar for secondary outcomes. Our analysis suggested that individualized PEEP and RM may be the optimal low tidal volume ventilation strategy at present, while low PEEP without RM is not suggested.

Keywords: Abdominal surgery; Alveolar recruitment maneuver; Individualized; Network meta-analysis; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Protective lung strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram. RCT randomized controlled trial, PRISMA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk-of-bias assessment of included studies
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Network plot of enrolled studies in this network meta-analysis. a Oxygenation index; b dynamic compliance; c mean arterial pressure; d heart rate; LPEEP low PEEP, MPEEP moderate PEEP, HPEEP high PEEP, IPEEP individualized PEEP, RM recruitment maneuver
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison-adjusted funnel plot for intraoperative oxygenation index. LPEEP low PEEP, MPEEP moderate PEEP, HPEEP high PEEP, IPEEP individualized PEEP, RM recruitment maneuver
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison-adjusted funnel plot for intraoperative dynamic compliance. LPEEP low PEEP, MPEEP moderate PEEP, HPEEP high PEEP, IPEEP individualized PEEP, RM recruitment maneuver

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009;111(5):979–987. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY, Allaouchiche B, Verzilli D, Leone M, De Jong A, Bazin JE, Pereira B, Jaber S. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):428–437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1301082. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malhotra A. Low-tidal-volume ventilation in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(11):1113–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct074213. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ladha K, Vidal Melo MF, McLean DJ, Wanderer JP, Grabitz SD, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications: hospital based registry study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2015;351:h3646. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Protti A, Andreis DT, Monti M, Santini A, Sparacino CC, Langer T, Votta E, Gatti S, Lombardi L, Leopardi O, Masson S, Cressoni M, Gattinoni L. Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation: any difference between statics and dynamics? Crit Care Med. 2013;41(4):1046–1055. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827417a6. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms