Deficient neural encoding of speech sounds in term neonates born after fetal growth restriction
- PMID: 34758093
- DOI: 10.1111/desc.13189
Deficient neural encoding of speech sounds in term neonates born after fetal growth restriction
Abstract
Infants born after fetal growth restriction (FGR)-an obstetric condition defined as the failure to achieve the genetic growth potential-are prone to neurodevelopmental delays, with language being one of the major affected areas. Yet, while verbal comprehension and expressive language impairments have been observed in FGR infants, children and even adults, specific related impairments at birth, such as in the ability to encode the sounds of speech, necessary for language acquisition, remain to be disclosed. Here, we used the frequency-following response (FFR), a brain potential correlate of the neural phase locking to complex auditory stimuli, to explore the encoding of speech sounds in FGR neonates. Fifty-three neonates born with FGR and 48 controls born with weight adequate-for-gestational age (AGA) were recruited. The FFR was recorded to the consonant-vowel stimulus (/da/) during sleep and quantified as the spectral amplitude to the fundamental frequency of the syllable and its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The outcome was available in 45 AGA and 51 FGR neonates, yielding no differences for spectral amplitudes. However, SNR was strongly attenuated in the FGR group compared to the AGA group at the vowel region of the stimulus. These findings suggest that FGR population present a deficit in the neural pitch tracking of speech sounds already present at birth. Our results pave the way for future research on the potential clinical use of the FFR in this population, so that if confirmed, a disrupted FFR recorded at birth may help deriving FGR neonates at risk for postnatal follow-ups.
Keywords: FFR; auditory brainstem response; auditory processing; fetal growth restriction; newborns; speech encoding.
© 2021 The Authors. Developmental Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Speech-Encoding Deficits in Neonates Born Large-for-Gestational Age as Revealed With the Envelope Frequency-Following Response.Ear Hear. 2023 Jul-Aug 01;44(4):829-841. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001330. Epub 2023 Feb 10. Ear Hear. 2023. PMID: 36759954
-
Prenatal daily musical exposure is associated with enhanced neural representation of speech fundamental frequency: Evidence from neonatal frequency-following responses.Dev Sci. 2023 Sep;26(5):e13362. doi: 10.1111/desc.13362. Epub 2023 Jan 5. Dev Sci. 2023. PMID: 36550689
-
Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):699-707. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821cc0df. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21543983
-
Electroencephalographic studies in growth-restricted and small-for-gestational-age neonates.Pediatr Res. 2022 Dec;92(6):1527-1534. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01992-2. Epub 2022 Feb 23. Pediatr Res. 2022. PMID: 35197567 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and fetal growth restriction following exposure in a previous birth: systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(2):183-192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14906. Epub 2017 Oct 3. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28856792
Cited by
-
Neonatal Frequency-Following Responses: A Methodological Framework for Clinical Applications.Semin Hear. 2022 Oct 26;43(3):162-176. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756162. eCollection 2022 Aug. Semin Hear. 2022. PMID: 36313048 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Frequency-Following Responses in Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024 Apr;25(2):131-147. doi: 10.1007/s10162-024-00932-7. Epub 2024 Feb 9. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38334887 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of Machine Learning on Human Frequency-Following Responses: A Tutorial.Semin Hear. 2022 Oct 26;43(3):251-274. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756219. eCollection 2022 Aug. Semin Hear. 2022. PMID: 36313046 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exposure to bilingual or monolingual maternal speech during pregnancy affects the neurophysiological encoding of speech sounds in neonates differently.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 May 22;18:1379660. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1379660. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38841122 Free PMC article.
-
The frequency-following response in late preterm neonates: a pilot study.Front Psychol. 2024 May 9;15:1341171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1341171. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 38784610 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (2019). Year 2019 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention, 4(2), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.15142/fptk-b748
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics and the Society forMaternal-FetalMedicin (2019). ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstetrics and gynecology, 133(2), e97-e109. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003070
-
- Arcangeli, T., Thilaganathan, B., Hooper, R., Khan, K. S., & Bhide, A. (2012). Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: A systematic review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40(3), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.11112
-
- Arenillas-Alcón, S., Costa-Faidella, J., Ribas-Prats, T., Gómez-Roig, M. D., & Escera, C. (2021). Neural encoding of voice pitch and formant structure at birth as revealed by frequency-following responses. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85799-x
-
- Atkinson, L., Beitchman, J., Gonzalez, A., Young, A., Wilson, B., Escobar, M., Chisholm, V., Brownlie, E., Khoury, J. E., Ludmer, J., & Villani, V. (2015). Cumulative risk, cumulative outcome: A 20-year longitudinal study. Plos One, 10(6),. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127650
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous