Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Aug;75(4):248-255.
doi: 10.5455/medarh.2021.75.248-255.

Inflated Co-authorship Introduces Bias to Current Scientometric Indices

Izet Masic  1 , Slobodan M Jankovic  1   2
Affiliations
Editorial

Inflated Co-authorship Introduces Bias to Current Scientometric Indices

Izet Masic et al. Med Arch. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Although scientometry gradually became prevalent way of measuring one's research output, there are many inherent drawbacks in main indices that are used: impact factor, number of citations, number of published papers and Hirsch's index.

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze effects of inflated co-authorship on values of scientometric indices among authors in biomedicine who participated in published papers with more than 30 co-authors.

Methods: The study was of cross-sectional type, based on 100 publications randomly extracted from the MEDLINE database. The inclusion criterion was publication with more than 30 authors. The studies with topics not related to humans were excluded from further analysis.

Results: On average about 10% of papers published by the surveyed authors had more than 30 co-authors, but these papers brought more than 40% of all citations and more than 40% of Hirsch's index attributed to these authors. The duration of scientific activity was well correlated to number of citations, Hirsch's index and the number of publications themselves with 30 or less co-authors, while the correlation did not exist with number of citations, Hirsch's index and the number of publications with more than 30 authors. In summary, publications with > 30 authors carry more scientometric points than publications with less co-authors, and the researchers with shorter scientific activity had larger scientometric benefit from publications with more than 30 authors than senior researchers.

Conclusion: Unjustified and prolific co-authorship is one of methods for inflation of scientometric indices that are not further reflecting true quality of research output of an individual. Further improvement of scientometric indicators may prevent unjustified co-authorship if it reflects the work invested in a research result.

Keywords: co-authorship; inflation; scientometric indices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The relationship between the duration of scientific activity and number of publications (total [n] and only of those with ≤ 30 authors [•]).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The relationship between the duration of scientific activity and number of citations (total [n] and only of those with ≤ 30 authors [•]).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. The relationship between the duration of scientific activity and Hirsh’s index (based on all publications [n] and on only of those with ≤ 30 authors [•]).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Author's Contfibution Statement Form signed by authors of paper published in Medical Archives journal
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. Published paper with more than 50 co-authors deposited on Pubmed database
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Masic I, Kujundzic E. Avicena. Sarajevo: 2013. Science Editing in Biomedicine and Humanities. 272 pp. ISBN: 978-9958-720-49-9.
    1. Masic I. Medical Publication and Scientometrics. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2013 Jun;18(6):624–630. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masic I. Writing and Editing of Scientific Papers Using BOMRAD Structured Form and Proper Style of References Citation. Int J Biomed Healthc. 2021 Apr;9(1):4–12. doi: 10.5455/ijbh.2021.9.4-11. - DOI
    1. Masic I, Begic E, Donev MD, Gajovic S, Gasparyan YA, Jakovljevic M, Milosevic BD, Sinanovic O, Sokolovic S, Uzunovic S, Zerem E. Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Journals. Croat Med J. 2016;57:527–9. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.527.529. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masic I. Missues of Authorsheep – Editor’s View. Med Arch. 2017 Aug;71(4):236–238. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.236-238. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources