Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 25:12:711439.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.711439. eCollection 2021.

How Emotional Intelligence Influences Cognitive Outcomes Among University Students: The Mediating Role of Relational Engagement During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Affiliations

How Emotional Intelligence Influences Cognitive Outcomes Among University Students: The Mediating Role of Relational Engagement During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Javed Iqbal et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

This study investigated the relationships among emotional intelligence (EI), relational engagement (RE), and cognitive outcomes (COs). A survey questionnaire containing 34 statements was completed by 338 undergraduate students from the four universities of China, with responses recorded on a 7-point Likert-type scale. The relationships were examined using the partial least squares structural equation modeling. The findings showed that EI influenced the COs directly and indirectly during the pandemic. In the forms of self-regulation (SR) and social skills (SS), the high levels of EI improved the COs of the students. Further, the aspects of EI, such as SR, self-awareness (SA), empathy (E), motivation (M), and SS were found to improve the RE of the students. The RE was positively correlated with the COs, indicating its potential for improving critical thinking among university students. Finally, the RE was a key mediator of the relationship between the EI and COs. It is concluded that the students with higher levels of EI and RE may achieve better COs. The implications of the research and suggestions for future studies are also discussed.

Keywords: China; Covid-19 pandemic; cognitive outcomes; emotional intelligence; relational engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical framework.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Determines the theoretical constructs with R2 values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashkanasy N. M., Daus C. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. J. Organiz. Behav. 26, 441–452. 10.1002/job.320 - DOI
    1. Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bullet. 88:588. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 - DOI
    1. Boyatzis R. E., Goleman D., Rhee K. (2000). Clustering competence in emotional intelligence: insights from the Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI)s, in Handbook of Emotional Intelligence, eds Bar-On R., Parker J. D. A. (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; ), 343–362.
    1. Calandri E., Graziano F., Begotti T., Cattelino E., Gattino S., Rollero C., et al. . (2021). Adjustment to COVID-19 lockdown among Italian University students: the role of concerns, change in peer and family relationships and in learning skills, emotional, and academic self-efficacy on depressive symptoms. Front. Psychol. 12:643088. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643088 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charoensukmongkol P., Phungsoonthorn T. (2020a). The effectiveness of supervisor support in lessening perceived uncertainties and emotional exhaustion of university employees during the COVID-19 crisis: the constraining role of organizational intransigence. J. General Psychol. 148, 431–450. 10.1080/00221309.2020.1795613 - DOI - PubMed