Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May;95(4):811-823.
doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01810-y. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Pesticide exposure of workers in apple growing in France

Affiliations

Pesticide exposure of workers in apple growing in France

Mathilde Bureau et al. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 May.

Abstract

Objective: Although apple trees are heavily sprayed, few studies have assessed the pesticide exposure of operators and workers in apple orchards. However, these data are crucial for assessing the health impact of such exposures. The aim of this study was to measure pesticide exposure in apple growing according to tasks and body parts.

Methods: A non-controlled field study was conducted in apple orchards in 4 regions of France during the 2016 and 2017 treatment seasons. Workers' external contamination and their determinants were assessed over 156 working days corresponding to 30 treatment days, 68 re-entry days and 58 harvesting days. We measured pesticide dermal contamination during each task and made detailed observations of work characteristics throughout the day. Captan and dithianon were used as markers of exposure.

Results: The median dermal contamination per day was 5.50 mg of captan and 3.33 mg of dithianon for operators, 24.39 mg of captan and 1.84 mg of dithianon for re-entry workers, and 5.82 mg of captan and 0.74 mg of dithianon for harvesters. Thus, workers performing re-entry tasks, especially thinning and anti-hail net opening, presented higher contamination, either equal to or higher than in operators. For these last ones, mixing/loading and equipment cleaning were the most contaminating tasks. Most of the contamination was observed on workers' hands in all tasks, except for net-opening in which their heads accounted for the most daily contamination.

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of taking indirect exposures into account during re-entry work in apple growing.

Keywords: Apple growing; Captan; Dermal contamination; Dithianon; Occupational exposure; Pesticides.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Location of patches and surface of the sampled body part
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pictures of the different types of sprayers observed in apple orchards: (a) Rear-mounted sprayer. (b) Trailed sprayer. (c) Self-propelled sprayer
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Distribution of the dermal contamination of workers during treatment (N = 17 [captan]; N = 13 [dithianon]), re-entry (N = 68 [captan]; N = 67 [dithianon]) and harvest (N = 54 [captan]; N = 54 [dithianon]) (minimum, 25e percentile, median, 75e percentile, maximum). b Distribution of the dermal contamination of operators during mixing/loading (N = 28 [captan]; N = 18 [dithianon]), spraying (N = 29 [captan]; N = 18 [dithianon]) and cleaning (N = 6 [captan]; N = 6 [dithianon]) (minimum, 25e percentile, median, 75e percentile, maximum)

References

    1. Abbott IM, Bonsall JL, Chester G, et al. Worker exposure to a herbicide applied with ground sprayers in the United Kingdom. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987;48:167–175. doi: 10.1080/15298668791384571. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Acquavella J, Olsen G, Cole P, et al. Cancer among farmers: a meta-analysis. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8:64–74. doi: 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00120-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adamis Z, Antal A, Füzesi I, et al. Occupational exposure to organophosphorus insecticides and synthetic pyrethroid. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1985;56:299–305. doi: 10.1007/BF00405271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agreste (2013) Structure des exploitations fruitières et légumières. Evolutions entre les recensements agricoles de 2000 et 2010. CTIFL, Ministère de l’agriculture, de l’agroalimentaire et de la forêt (France), Montreuil-sous-Bois
    1. Agreste, Statistique agricole annuelle 2019—Données définitives. Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’alimentation: Statistique publique, Paris; 2020.