Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;9(1):57-65.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.1105. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Signs and symptoms, apart from vital signs, that trigger nurses' concerns about deteriorating conditions in hospitalized paediatric patients: A scoping review

Affiliations

Signs and symptoms, apart from vital signs, that trigger nurses' concerns about deteriorating conditions in hospitalized paediatric patients: A scoping review

Claus Sixtus Jensen et al. Nurs Open. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: This scoping review aimed to identify and map the signs and symptoms-apart from vital signs-that trigger nurses' concerns about the deteriorating conditions of hospitalized paediatric patients.

Design: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.

Methods: Six databases, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, Swemed and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses databases, were searched systematically. Of 5795 citations, seven matched the inclusion criteria.

Results: Objective observations, such as the patient's colour, pain-level changes, and behavioural observations, were identified as signs that would trigger nurses' concerns. Nurse's intuitive feelings or gut feelings when seeing a patient was also identified as an important factor for identifying a deteriorating paediatric patient. A "gut feeling" was described as both a reaction to patient signs and a feeling based on the nurse's intuition gained through experience. The signs or symptoms that would trigger this "gut feeling" were not identified.

Keywords: clinical deterioration; early recognition; nurse intuition; nursing concern; pediatric nursing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search results and study selection and inclusion process

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Benner, P. , Hughes, R. G. , & Sutphen, M. (2008). Clinical reasoning, decisionmaking, and action: Thinking critically and clinically. In Hughes R. G. (Ed.), Patient safety and quality: An evidence‐based handbook for nurses Rockville. - PubMed
    1. Benner, P. , Tanner, C. A. , & Chesla, A. C. (2009). Clinical judgment. In Expertise in nursing practice caring, clinical judgment & ethics (2nd ed., pp. 199–232): Springer.
    1. Bonafide, C. P. , Roberts, K. E. , Weirich, C. M. , Paciotti, B. , Tibbetts, K. M. , Keren, R. , Barg, F. K. , & Holmes, J. H. (2013). Beyond statistical prediction: Qualitative evaluation of the mechanisms by which pediatric early warning scores impact patient safety. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 8(5), 248–253. - PubMed
    1. Bowen, L. , Shaw, A. , Lyttle, M. D. , & Purdy, S. (2017). The transition to clinical expert: Enhanced decision making for children aged less than 5 years attending the paediatric ED with acute respiratory conditions. Emergency Medicine Journal, 34(2), 76‐81. 10.1136/emermed-2015-205211 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brady, P. W. , & Goldenhar, L. M. (2014). A qualitative study examining the influences on situation awareness and the identification, mitigation and escalation of recognised patient risk. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23(2), 153–161. 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001747 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types