Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec 10;7(12):3125-3160.
doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00465. Epub 2021 Nov 11.

Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Antimicrobial Materials for Resolution of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections In Vivo

Affiliations
Review

Recent Advances in the Evaluation of Antimicrobial Materials for Resolution of Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections In Vivo

Erika L Cyphert et al. ACS Infect Dis. .

Abstract

While orthopedic implant-associated infections are rare, revision surgeries resulting from infections incur considerable healthcare costs and represent a substantial research area clinically, in academia, and in industry. In recent years, there have been numerous advances in the development of antimicrobial strategies for the prevention and treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections which offer promise to improve the limitations of existing delivery systems through local and controlled release of antimicrobial agents. Prior to translation to in vivo orthopedic implant-associated infection models, the properties (e.g., degradation, antimicrobial activity, biocompatibility) of the antimicrobial materials can be evaluated in subcutaneous implant in vivo models. The antimicrobial materials are then incorporated into in vivo implant models to evaluate the efficacy of using the material to prevent or treat implant-associated infections. Recent technological advances such as 3D-printing, bacterial genomic sequencing, and real-time in vivo imaging of infection and inflammation have contributed to the development of preclinical implant-associated infection models that more effectively recapitulate the clinical presentation of infections and improve the evaluation of antimicrobial materials. This Review highlights the advantages and limitations of antimicrobial materials used in conjunction with orthopedic implants for the prevention and treatment of orthopedic implant-associated infections and discusses how these materials are evaluated in preclinical in vivo models. This analysis serves as a resource for biomaterial researchers in the selection of an appropriate orthopedic implant-associated infection preclinical model to evaluate novel antimicrobial materials.

Keywords: Antibiotic; Drug delivery; Implant; In vivo; Periprosthetic joint infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Summary of recent advances in implant-associated infection preclinical in vivo models used to simulate the clinical environment of infections. Models have utilized emerging technologies of 3D-printing and bacterial genomic sequencing to improve the clinical relevancy of the model and to analyze the role of patient risk factors on the development of implant-associated infections. Figure created using BioRender.com.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Setup of ex vivo PMMA bone cement push-out testing model using bovine femur tissue. Small, uniform wafers of bovine femur were machined from a cleaned/bleached femur segment (a) with eight 5/32 in. holes spaced 0.3 in. apart (b). Holes in the femur wafer were packed with PMMA materials, and a 1/8 in. steel pin was used to push embedded PMMA out of the femur wafer under compressive force at a loading rate of 20 mm/min (c). “Pushed-out” PMMA specimen from femur wafer (d). Representative raw force versus displacement plot of interfacial shear strength of PMMA pushed-out of a single 5/32 in. hole (e). Images were taken by the authors.

References

    1. Wagner ER; Farley KX; Higgins I; Wilson JM; Daly CA; Gottschalk MB The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elb. Surg 2020, 29, 2601–2609. - PubMed
    1. Poff CB; Kothandaraman V; Kunkle BF; Friedman RJ; Eichinger JK Trends in total elbow arthroplasty utilization in the United States from 2002 to 2017. Semin. Arthroplasty JSES 2021, 31, 389.
    1. Tande AJ; Patel R Prosthetic joint infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev 2014, 27, 302–345. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Triantafyllopoulos GK; Memtsoudis SG; Zhang W; Ma Y; Sculco TP; Poultsides LA Periprosthetic infection recurrence after 2-stage exchange arthroplasty: Failure or fate? J. Arthroplasty 2017, 32, 526–531. - PubMed
    1. Zmistowski BM; Manrique J; Patel R; Chen AF Recurrent periprosthetic joint infection after irrigation and debridement with component retention is most often due to identical organisms. J. Arthoplasty 2016, 31, 148–151. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources