An Assessment of Third-Party Reporting of Close Ties to Measure Sensitive Behaviors: The Confidante Method to Measure Abortion Incidence in Ethiopia and Uganda
- PMID: 34762302
- PMCID: PMC9298764
- DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12180
An Assessment of Third-Party Reporting of Close Ties to Measure Sensitive Behaviors: The Confidante Method to Measure Abortion Incidence in Ethiopia and Uganda
Abstract
Indirect estimation techniques are important tools for measuring sensitive and stigmatized behaviors. This includes third-party reporting methods, which have become increasingly common in the field of abortion measurement, where direct survey approaches notoriously lead to underreporting. This paper provides the first in-depth assessment of one of the most widely used of these techniques in the field of abortion measurement: the confidante method. We outline six key assumptions behind the confidante method and describe how violations of these assumptions can bias resulting estimates. Using data from modules added to the performance monitoring for action surveys in Uganda and Ethiopia in 2018, we compute one-year abortion incidence estimates using the confidante method. We also perform a validation check, using the method to estimate intrauterine device /implant use. Our results revealed implementation problems in both settings. Several of the method's foundational assumptions were violated, and efforts to adjust for these violations either failed or only partially addressed the resulting bias. Our validation check also failed, resulting in a gross overestimate of intrauterine device/implant use. These results have implications more broadly for the potential biases that can be introduced in using third-party reporting of close ties to measure other sensitive or stigmatized behaviors.
© 2021 The Authors. Studies in Family Planning published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Population Council.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
The confidante method to measure abortion: implementing a standardized comparative analysis approach across seven contexts.Popul Health Metr. 2023 Jul 25;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12963-023-00310-0. Popul Health Metr. 2023. PMID: 37491276 Free PMC article.
-
Social network-based measurement of abortion incidence: promising findings from population-based surveys in Nigeria, Cote d'Ivoire, and Rajasthan, India.Popul Health Metr. 2020 Oct 19;18(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12963-020-00235-y. Popul Health Metr. 2020. PMID: 33076922 Free PMC article.
-
An Application of the Confidante Method to Estimate Induced Abortion Incidence in Java, Indonesia.Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Sep 29;46:199-210. doi: 10.1363/46e0120. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 33001827
-
Novel approaches to estimating abortion incidence.Reprod Health. 2019 Apr 18;16(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0702-0. Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 30999917 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Estimating induced abortion rates: a review.Stud Fam Plann. 2003 Jun;34(2):87-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2003.00087.x. Stud Fam Plann. 2003. PMID: 12889341 Review.
Cited by
-
An investigation of the impact of the Global Gag Rule on women's sexual and reproductive health outcomes in Uganda: a difference-in-differences analysis.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2122938. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2122938. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022. PMID: 36259938 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing induced abortion underreporting in restrictive settings using prospective morbidity surveys from Kenya, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 6;15(1):28756. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14096-8. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40770399 Free PMC article.
-
Induced abortion incidence and safety in Burkina Faso in 2020: Results from a population-based survey using direct and social network-based estimation approaches.PLoS One. 2022 Nov 30;17(11):e0278168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278168. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 36449473 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating induced abortion incidence and the use of non-recommended abortion methods and sources in two provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Kinshasa and Kongo Central) in 2021: results from population-based, cross-sectional surveys of reproductive-aged women.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2207279. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2207279. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023. PMID: 37216481 Free PMC article.
-
Estimating the Social Visibility of Abortions in Uganda and Ethiopia Using the Game of Contacts.Stud Fam Plann. 2024 Dec;55(4):291-314. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12278. Epub 2024 Nov 12. Stud Fam Plann. 2024. PMID: 39533531 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bell, Suzanne O. , OlaOlorun Funmilola, Shankar Mridula, Ahmad Danish, Guiella Georges, Omoluabi Elizabeth, Khanna Anoop, Hyacinthe Andoh Kouakou, and Moreau Caroline. 2019. “Measurement of Abortion Safety Using Community‐Based Surveys: Findings from Three Countries.” PLoS ONE 14(11): e0223146. 10.1371/journal.pone.0223146. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bell, Suzanne O. , Shankar Mridula, Omoluabi Elizabeth, Khanna Anoop, Andoh Hyacinthe Kouakou, OlaOlorun Funmilola, Ahmad Danish, Guiella Georges, Ahmed Saifuddin, and Moreau Caroline. 2020. “Social Network‐Based Measurement of Abortion Incidence: Promising Findings from Population‐Based Surveys in Nigeria, Cote d'Ivoire, and Rajasthan, India.” Population Health Metrics 18(1): 28. 10.1186/s12963-020-00235-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical