Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e048504.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048504.

Relevance of assessment items in community paramedicine home visit programmes: results of a modified Delphi study

Affiliations

Relevance of assessment items in community paramedicine home visit programmes: results of a modified Delphi study

Matthew S Leyenaar et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Guidelines for a structured assessment in community paramedicine home visit programmes have not been established and evidence to inform their creation is lacking. We sought to investigate the relevance of assessment items to the practice of community paramedics according to a pre-established clarity-utility matrix.

Design: We designed a modified-Delphi study consisting of predetermined thresholds for achieving consensus, number of rounds of for scoring items, a defined meeting and discussion process, and a sample of participants that was purposefully representative.

Setting and participants: We established a panel of 26 community paramedics representing 20 municipal paramedic services in Ontario, Canada. The sample represented a majority of paramedic services within the province that were operating a community paramedicine home visit programme.

Measures: Drawing from a bank of standardised assessment items grouped according to domains aligned with the International Classification on Functioning, Disability, and Health taxonomy, 64 previously pilot-tested assessment items were scored according to their clarity (being free from ambiguity and easy to understand) and utility (being valued in care planning or case management activities). Assessment items covered a broad range of health, social and environmental domains. To conclude scoring rounds, assessment items that did not achieve consensus for relevance to assessment practices were discussed among participants with opportunities to modify assessment items for subsequent rounds of scoring.

Results: Resulting from the first round of scoring, 54 assessment items were identified as being relevant to assessment practices and 3 assessment items were removed from subsequent rounds. The remaining 7 assessment items were modified, with some parts removed from the final items that achieved consensus in the final rounds of scoring.

Conclusion: A broadly representative panel of community paramedics identified consensus for 61 assessment items that could be included in a structured, multidomain, assessment instrument for guiding practice in community paramedicine home visit programmes.

Trail registration number: ISRCTN58273216.

Keywords: accident & emergency medicine; health services administration & management; preventive medicine; primary care; protocols & guidelines; statistics & research methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Matrix of clarity and utility used to define relevance of assessment items.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration representing outcomes from each round of the study. Diamonds represent consensus for exclusion/removal of assessment items, ellipses represent consensus for relevance of assessment items.

References

    1. Colbeck MA, Maria S, Eaton G, et al. . International examination and synthesis of the primary and secondary surveys in Paramedicine. Irish J Para 2018;3:1–9. 10.32378/ijp.v3i2.91 - DOI
    1. Ambulance Victoria . Ambulance Victoria patient assessment standards, 2019: 1–52.
    1. Jensen JL, Croskerry P, Travers AH. Consensus on paramedic clinical decisions during high-acuity emergency calls: results of a Canadian Delphi study. CJEM 2011;13:310–8. 10.2310/8000.2011.110405 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Curtis K, Murphy M, Hoy S, et al. . The emergency nursing assessment process—A structured framework for a systematic approach. Australas Emerg Nurs J 2009;12:130–6. 10.1016/j.aenj.2009.07.003 - DOI
    1. Munroe B, Curtis K, Considine J, et al. . The impact structured patient assessment frameworks have on patient care: an integrative review. J Clin Nurs 2013;22:2991–3005. 10.1111/jocn.12226 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types