Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019:18:31.
doi: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031.

Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations

Affiliations

Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations

Stephanie Russo Carroll et al. Data Sci J. 2019.

Abstract

Data have become the new global currency, and a powerful force in making decisions and wielding power. As the world engages with open data, big data reuse, and data linkage, what do data-driven futures look like for communities plagued by data inequities? Indigenous data stakeholders and non-Indigenous allies have explored this question over the last three years in a series of meetings through the Research Data Alliance (RDA). Drawing on RDA and other gatherings, and a systematic scan of literature and practice, we consider possible answers to this question in the context of Indigenous peoples vis-á-vis two emerging concepts: Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance. Specifically, we focus on the data challenges facing Native nations and the intersection of data, tribal sovereignty, and power. Indigenous data sovereignty is the right of each Native nation to govern the collection, ownership, and application of the tribe's data. Native nations exercise Indigenous data sovereignty through the interrelated processes of Indigenous data governance and decolonizing data. This paper explores the implications of Indigenous data sovereignty and Indigenous data governance for Native nations and others. We argue for the repositioning of authority over Indigenous data back to Indigenous peoples. At the same time, we recognize that there are significant obstacles to rebuilding effective Indigenous data systems and the process will require resources, time, and partnerships among Native nations, other governments, and data agents.

Keywords: Data Sovereignty; Data Stewardship; Indigenous Data Governance; Indigenous Data Sovereignty; Indigenous Sovereignty; Sovereignty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Reclaiming Indigenous Data Sovereignty Through Indigenous Data Governance and Decolonizing Data.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Data and Governance: The Interdependence of Nation Rebuilding and Data Rebuilding.

References

    1. Banerjee SB. 2003. The Practice of Stakeholder Colonialism: National Interest and Colonial Discourses in the Management of Indigenous Stakeholders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781403982292_11 - DOI
    1. Berry A 2009. Two forests under the big sky: Tribal v. federal management, PERC Policy Series No. 45. Available at http://www.perc.org/articles/article1174.php.
    1. British Columbia First Nation’s Data Governance Initiative. 2018. British Columbia First Nation’s Data Governance Initiative. Available at http://www.bcfndgi.com/ [Last accessed 23 August 2018].
    1. Bruhn J 2014. Identifying Useful Approaches to the Governance of Indigenous Data. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from: http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/iipj/vol5/iss2/5. DOI: 10.18584/iipj.2014.5.2.5 - DOI
    1. Cajete G 2000. Native Science: Natural Laws of Interdependence. Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publishers.

LinkOut - more resources