Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr-Jun;47(2):204-208.
doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.47.02.09. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

Clostridoides difficile Infection Severity Assessment by Fecal Calprotectin: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Clostridoides difficile Infection Severity Assessment by Fecal Calprotectin: A Pilot Study

Mirela Nicoleta Voicu et al. Curr Health Sci J. 2021 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Clostridoides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of antibiotic related diarrhea therapy and may associate high morbidity and mortality. Providing a potential biomarker to assess disease severity may help physicians in choosing the right treatment.

Methods: This was a prospective, single-centre cohort study which included patients diagnosed with CDI which were assessed by fecal calprotectin (FC).

Results: Patients included had a mean of 69.29 years of age, 54.23% of male gender. Patients diagnosed with mild CDI had a mean ATLAS score of 3.39 (±1.24), statistically lower (p<0.001) than patients with severe CDI who had a mean ATLAS score of 7.33 (±0.77). Fecal calprotectin concentrations were significantly higher (p<0.001) in the severe CDI patients (615.14μg/g; IQR, 403.62-784.4μg/g) than in the mild CDI patients (195.42μg/g; IQR, 131.12-298.59μg/g). We suggest a cut-off of 290.09μg/g for the predictive marker of fecal calprotectin, which permitted to identify patients with severe and mild CDI, having 100% sensitivity and 76% specificity.

Conclusions: Our findings point out the potential that FC might have, as a biomarker for disease severity. However, future multicentre studies and in larger cohort need to validate the results.

Keywords: Clostridoides difficile infection; fecal calprotectin; predictive value.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Violin plots showing the distribution of values for ATLAS score and Fecal calprotectin by severity CDI patients
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve analysis of fecal calprotectin concentrations by severity CDI

References

    1. Martin JS, Monaghan TM, Wilcox MH. Clostridium difficile infection: epidemiology, diagnosis and understanding transmission. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(4):206–216. - PubMed
    1. Burke KE, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection: a worldwide disease. Gut Liver. 2014;8(1):1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Song JH, Kim YS. Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: Risk Factors, Treatment, and Prevention. Gut Liver. 2019;13(1):16–24. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015;313(4):398–408. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Kelly CP, Loo VG, McDonald LC, Pepin J, Wilcox MH, Society for Healthcare epidemiology of America Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(5):431–455. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources