Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct;8(4):376-390.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 14.

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Molecular markers of systemic therapy response in urothelial carcinoma

Francesco Claps et al. Asian J Urol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Identification of reliable molecular biomarkers that can complement clinical practice represents a fascinating challenge in any cancer field. Urothelial carcinoma is a very heterogeneous disease and responses to systemic therapies, and outcomes after radical cystectomy are difficult to predict. Advances in molecular biology such as next generation sequencing and whole genome or transcriptomic analysis provide promising platforms to achieve a full understanding of the biology behind the disease and can identify emerging predictive biomarkers. Moreover, the ability to categorize patients' risk of recurrence after curative treatment, or even predict benefit from a conventional or targeted therapies, represents a compelling challenge that may reshape both selection for tailored treatment and disease monitoring. Progress has been made but currently no molecular biomarkers are used in the clinical setting to predict response to systemic agents in either neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings highlighting a relevant unmet need. Here, we aim to present the emerging role of molecular biomarkers in predicting response to systemic agents in urothelial carcinoma.

Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy; Biomarkers; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Precision oncology; Targeted therapies; Urothelial carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Cronin K.A., Lake A.J., Scott S., Sherman R.L., Noone A.M., Howlader N. Annual report to the Nation on the status of cancer, part I: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2018;124:2785–2800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antoni S., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Znaor A., Jemal A., Bray F. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality: A global overview and recent trends. Eur Urol. 2017;71:96–108. - PubMed
    1. van Rhijn B.W.G., Burger M., Lotan Y., Solsona E., Stief C.G., Sylvester R.J. Recurrence and progression of disease in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: From epidemiology to treatment strategy. Eur Urol. 2009;56:430–442. - PubMed
    1. Grossman H.B., Natale R.B., Tangen C.M., Speights V.O., Vogelzang N.J., Trump D.L. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus cystectomy compared with cystectomy alone for locally advanced bladder cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:859–866. - PubMed
    1. Yin M., Joshi M., Meijer R.P., Glantz M., Holder S., Harvey H.A. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and two-step meta-analysis. Oncol. 2016;21:708–715. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources