Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 1:42:101176.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101176. eCollection 2021 Dec.

A modeling analysis to compare eligibility strategies for lung cancer screening in Brazil

Adalberto Miranda-Filho  1 , Hadrien Charvat  1 , Freddie Bray  1 , Arn Migowski  2   3 , Li C Cheung  4 , Salvatore Vaccarella  1 , Mattias Johansson  1 , Andre L Carvalho  1 , Hilary A Robbins  1
Affiliations

A modeling analysis to compare eligibility strategies for lung cancer screening in Brazil

Adalberto Miranda-Filho et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Country-specific evidence is needed to guide decisions regarding whether and how to implement lung cancer screening in different settings. For this study, we estimated the potential numbers of individuals screened and lung cancer deaths prevented in Brazil after applying different strategies to define screening eligibility.

Methods: We applied the Lung Cancer Death Risk Assessment Tool (LCDRAT) to survey data on current and former smokers (ever-smokers) in 15 Brazilian state capital cities that comprise 18% of the Brazilian population. We evaluated three strategies to define eligibility for screening: (1) pack-years and cessation time (≥30 pack-years and <15 years since cessation); (2) the LCDRAT risk model with a fixed risk threshold; and (3) LCDRAT with age-specific risk thresholds.

Findings: Among 2.3 million Brazilian ever-smokers aged 55-79 years, 21,459 (95%CI 20,532-22,387) lung cancer deaths were predicted over 5 years without screening. Applying the fixed risk-based eligibility definition would prevent more lung cancer deaths than the pack-years definition [2,939 (95%CI 2751-3127) vs. 2,500 (95%CI 2318-2681) lung cancer deaths], and with higher screening efficiency [NNS=177 (95%CI 170-183) vs. 205 (95%CI 194-216)], but would tend to screen older individuals [mean age 67.8 (95%CI 67.5-68.2) vs. 63.4 (95%CI 63.0-63.9) years]. Applying age-specific risk thresholds would allow younger ever-smokers to be screened, although these individuals would be at lower risk. The age-specific thresholds strategy would avert three-fifths (60.1%) of preventable lung cancer deaths [N = 2629 (95%CI 2448-2810)] by screening 21.9% of ever-smokers.

Interpretation: The definition of eligibility impacts the efficiency of lung cancer screening and the mean age of the eligible population. As implementation of lung screening proceeds in different countries, our analytical framework can be used to guide similar analyses in other contexts. Due to limitations of our models, more research would be needed.

Keywords: Brazil; Early cancer detection; Lung cancer screening; Tobacco smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Oudkerk M., Liu S., Heuvelmans M.A., Walter J.E., Field J.K. Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction — evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 http://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-020-00432-6 [Internet]Oct 12 [cited 2020 Dec 28]; Available from: - PubMed
    1. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Koning H.J., van der Aalst C.M., de Jong P.A., Scholten E.T., Nackaerts K., Heuvelmans M.A. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med. 2020 http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1911793 [Internet]Jan 29 [cited 2020 Feb 3]; Available from: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moyer V.A. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330–338. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care Recommendations on screening for lung cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 2016;188(6):425–432. - PMC - PubMed