Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 22;18(21):11124.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111124.

An Evaluation of Natural Environment Interventions for Informal Cancer Caregivers in the Community

Affiliations
Review

An Evaluation of Natural Environment Interventions for Informal Cancer Caregivers in the Community

Rebecca H Lehto et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Home-based informal caregiving by friends and family members of patients with cancer is be-coming increasingly common globally with rates continuing to rise. Such caregiving is often emo-tionally and cognitively demanding, resulting in mental exhaustion and high perceived burden. Support for caregivers may be fostered by engagement with the natural environment. Interaction with nature is associated with mental health benefits such as stress reduction and improved well-being. The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the state of the science regarding the use of nat-ural environment interventions to support caregivers of cancer patients in the community. A comprehensive scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and the Preferred Re-porting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses assessed natural environment therapies and mental health outcomes among cancer caregivers. Databases searched included CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Alt HealthWatch. Findings recovered a total of five studies over a 10-year period that met criteria, demonstrating a lack of empirical evidence addressing this po-tential resource to support caregivers. Often, study appraisal was not on nature exposure, but ra-ther other aspects of the projects such as program evaluation, exercise, or complementary thera-pies. Both qualitative and quantitative designs were used but sample sizes were small. Caregivers experienced beneficial results across the various studies and future work could enhance these findings.

Keywords: cancer caregivers; environment; health; integrative therapies; nature; quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA-ScR diagram of search strategy.

References

    1. Robinson J.M., Jorgensen A., Cameron R., Brindley P. Let nature be thy medicine: A socioecological exploration of green prescribing in the UK. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:3460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103460. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Romito F., Goldzweig G., Cormio C., Hagedoorn M., Andersen B.L. Informal caregiving for cancer patients. Cancer. 2013;119:2160–2169. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28057. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert S.D., Ould Brahim L., Morrison M., Girgis A., Yaffe M., Belzile E., Clayberg K., Robinson J., Thorne S., Bottorff J.L., et al. Priorities for caregiver research in cancer care: An international Delphi survey of caregivers, clinicians, managers, and researchers. Supportive Care Cancer. 2019;27:805–817. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4314-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert S.D., Girgis A. Unmet supportive care needs among informal caregivers of patients with cancer: Opportunities and challenges in informing the development of interventions. Asia-Pac. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2017;4:136–139. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.204485. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kent E.E., Rowland J.H., Northouse L., Litzelman K., Chou W.Y., Shelburne N., Timura C., O’Mara A., Huss K. Caring for caregivers and patients: Research and clinical priorities for informal cancer caregiving. Cancer. 2016;122:1987–1995. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types