Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11337.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111337.

Patient Satisfaction Determinants of Inpatient Healthcare

Affiliations

Patient Satisfaction Determinants of Inpatient Healthcare

Beata Gavurova et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse and evaluate the determinants influencing the overall satisfaction of patients with inpatient healthcare in the conditions of the Czech Republic. A total of the 1425 patients, who experienced hospitalisation and agreed to participate, were questioned in the study. A research questionnaire was used to obtain data on satisfaction with hospitalisation. The subject of the research consisted of the indicators related to the following factors: (i) satisfaction with the hospital, clinic, room and meals; (ii) satisfaction with medical staff-nurses, physician expertise and other staff; (iii) the quality of the treatment provided; (iv) satisfaction with leaving the hospital. The formulated statistical hypotheses were evaluated through structural equation modelling. The results of the analyses brought interesting findings. Satisfaction with medical staff is the most significant factor which has a positive effect on satisfaction with hospitalisation. Physician expertise (with trust and good communication skills) is more important for patients than satisfaction with nurses or other staff. The results obtained from the study represent valuable information for policymakers, regional healthcare plans, as well as for managers of hospitals.

Keywords: health policy; healthcare; healthcare quality; hospitalisation; patient; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Final SEM model. Source: own research.

References

    1. Jennings B.M., Heiner S.L., Loan L.A., Hemman E.A., Swanson K.M. What Really Matters to Healthcare Consumers. JONA J. Nurs. Adm. 2005;35:173–180. doi: 10.1097/00005110-200504000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Verulava T., Sibashvili N. Accessibility to psychiatric services in georgia. Afr. J. Psychiatry. 2015;18:1–5.
    1. Verulava T., Jincharadze N., Jorbenadze R. Role of primary health care in re-hospitalization of patients with heart failure. Georgian Med. News. 2017;264:135–139. - PubMed
    1. Gavurova B., Rigelsky M., Ivankova V. Perceived health status and economic growth in terms of gender-oriented inequalities in the OECD countries. Econ. Sociol. 2020;13:245–257. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2020/13-2/16. - DOI
    1. Ucieklak-Jeż P., Bem A. Does “Rural” Always Mean the Same? Macrosocial Determinants of Rural Populations’ Health in Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:397. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020397. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources