Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 7;18(21):11697.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111697.

School Interventions for Bullying-Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects

Affiliations

School Interventions for Bullying-Cyberbullying Prevention in Adolescents: Insights from the UPRIGHT and CREEP Projects

Silvia Gabrielli et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Several challenges and emotional demands characterize adolescence, affecting the mental well-being of youths. Among these, bullying and cyberbullying are recognized nowadays as a major social problem, affecting more than one-third of adolescents, with extensive negative consequences for the victims involved, such as lower self-esteem, increased loneliness, depression, and anxiety. School programs and interventions that foster resilience, coping, and well-being are particularly important during adolescence as protective and preventive factors against the consequences of (cyber)bullying. The paper presents two recent co-designed interventions for (cyber)bullying prevention deployed in Europe, targeting early adolescents and their school communities.

Methods: The UPRIGHT project developed an evidence-based, whole-school intervention to train resilience as a protective factor to promote mental well-being in adolescents, in a cross-national perspective. The CREEP project designed and implemented digital interventions to support schools in (i) early detection of cyberbullying events on social media and (ii) coaching adolescents (victims, bullies, bystanders) on how to cope with (cyber)bullying behaviors.

Results: The main challenges and insights collected during the design and implementation of both interventions are discussed to inform future research and practice.

Conclusion: The feasibility and acceptance of prevention programs are key to the reducing risk of (cyber)bullying and improving the psychological well-being of early adolescents.

Keywords: adolescence; bullying; co-design; cyberbullying; digital interventions; mental health; resilience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Components and skills of UPRIGHT program.
Figure 2
Figure 2
UPRIGHT overall implementation phases.

References

    1. Patchin J.W., Cyberbullying Research Center 2019 Cyberbullying Data. Jul 9, 2019. [(accessed on 6 January 2020)]. Available online: https://cyberbullying.org/2019-cyberbullying-data.
    1. Craig W., Harel-Fisch Y., Fogel-Grinvald H., Dostaler S., Hetland J., Simons-Morton B., Molcho M., de Mato M.G., Overpeck M., Due P., et al. A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. Int. J. Public Health. 2009;54((Suppl. 2)):216–224. doi: 10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjorkqvist K., Lagerspetz K.M.J., Kaukiainen A. Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggress. Behav. 1992;18:117–127. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2<117::AID-AB2480180205>3.0.CO;2-3. - DOI
    1. Ericson N. Addressing the Problem of Juvenile Bullying. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile; District of Columbia, WA, USA: 2001.
    1. Kowalski R.M., Giumetti G.W., Schroeder A.N., Lattanner M.R. Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta- analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol. Bull. 2014;140:1073. doi: 10.1037/a0035618. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types