Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 21;13(21):5278.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13215278.

Vascular Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Vascular Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Alejandro Serrablo et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Among the cholangiocarcinomas, the most common type is perihilar (phCC), accounting for approximately 60% of cases, after which are the distal and then intrahepatic forms. There is no staging system that allows for a comparison of all series and extraction of conclusions that increase the long-term survival rate of this dismal disease. The extension of the resection, which theoretically depends on the type of phCC, is not a closed subject. As surgery is the only known way to achieve a cure, many aggressive approaches have been adopted. Despite extended liver resections and even vascular resections, margins are positive in around one third of patients. In the past two decades, with advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, surgical outcomes and survival rates have gradually improved, although variability is the rule, with morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 14% to 76% and from 0% to 19%, respectively. Extended hepatectomies and portal vein resection, or even right hepatic artery reconstruction for the left side tumors are frequently needed. Salvage procedures when arterial reconstruction is not feasible, as well as hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, are still under evaluation too. In this article, we discuss the aggressive surgical approach to phCC focused on vascular resection. Disparate results on the surgical treatment of phCC made it impossible to reach clear-cut conclusions.

Keywords: biliary carcinoma; perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; surgery in vascular involvement; vascular invasion in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vascular resections options. phCCA: perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; VR: vascular resection; PV: portal vein; HA: hepatic artery; HPD: hepatopancreatectoduodenectomy; S1: segment 1; BDR: biliary duct resection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Miguel Servet/Mainz Series.

References

    1. Altameier W.A., Gall E.A., Zinninger M.M., Hoxworth P.I. Sclerosing carcinoma of the major intrahepatic bile ducts. AMA Arch. Surg. 1957;75:450–460. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1957.01280150140015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of hepatic duct at its bifurcation within Porta Hepatis. An usual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am. J. Med. 1965;38:241–256. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90178-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serrablo A., Tejedor L. Outcome of surgical resection in Klatskin tumors. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2013;15:147–158. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.147. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Oliveira M.L., Cunningham S.C., Cameron J.L., Kamangar F., Winter J.M., Lillemoe K.D., Choti M.A., Yeo C.J., Schulick R.D. Cholangiocarcinoma: Thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann. Surg. 2007;245:755–762. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000251366.62632.d3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebata T., Kosuge T., Hirano S., Unno M., Yamamoto M., Miyazaki M., Kokudo N., Miyagawa S., Takada T., Nagino M. Proposal to modify the international union against cancer staging system for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas. J. Br. Surg. 2014;101:79–88. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9379. - DOI - PubMed