Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 22;13(21):5299.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13215299.

Plasma-Based Genotyping in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Affiliations
Review

Plasma-Based Genotyping in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Maisam Makarem et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Molecular genotyping for advanced solid malignancies has transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic disease. Treatment decisions in a growing number of tumors require knowledge of molecularly driven alterations in order to select optimal targeted therapy. Although genomic testing of tumor tissue is the gold standard for identifying targetable genomic alterations, biopsy samples are often limited or difficult to access. This has paved the way for the development of plasma-based approaches for genomic profiling. Recent advances in the detection of plasma-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the integration of plasma-based molecular profiling into clinical practice as an alternative or complementary tool for genomic testing in the setting of advanced cancer, to facilitate the identification of driver mutations to guide initial treatment and diagnose resistance. Several guidelines now recommend the use of plasma where tumor tissue is limited to identify a targetable genomic alteration. Current plasma-based assays can evaluate multiple genes in comprehensive panels, and their application in advanced disease will be increasingly incorporated into standard practice. This review focuses on current and future applications of plasma ctDNA-based assays in advanced solid malignancies, while highlighting some limitations in implementing this technology into clinical practice.

Keywords: ctDNA; guideline recommendations; plasma genotyping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no relevant conflicts. NBL has received unrelated institutional research funding from Guardant Health, Roche, and Inivata.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bedard P.L., Hyman D.M., Davids M.S., Siu L.L. Small molecules, big impact: 20 years of targeted therapy in oncology. Lancet. 2020;395:1078–1088. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30164-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aldea M., Andre F., Marabelle A., Dogan S., Barlesi F., Soria J.-C. Overcoming resistance to tumor-targeted and immune-targeted therapies. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:874–899. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1638. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malapelle U., Tiseo M., Vivancos A., Kapp J., Serrano M.J., Tiemann M. Liquid biopsy for biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer: A European perspective. J. Mol. Pathol. 2021;2:255–273. doi: 10.3390/jmp2030022. - DOI
    1. Pennell N.A., Arcila M.E., Gandara D.R., West H. Biomarker testing for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Real-world issues and tough choices. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book. 2019;39:531–542. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_237863. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pantel K., Alix-Panabières C. Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease—latest advances and implications for cure. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2019;16:409–424. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0187-3. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources