Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 5;13(21):5548.
doi: 10.3390/cancers13215548.

First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Are the Most Appropriate Combination Therapies?

Affiliations
Review

First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Are the Most Appropriate Combination Therapies?

Yann-Alexandre Vano et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

The development of antiangiogenic treatments, followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), has significantly changed the management of metastatic clear cell renal cell cancer. Several phase III trials show the superiority of combination therapy, dual immunotherapy (ICI-ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) of the vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) over sunitinib monotherapy. The question is therefore what is the best combination for a given patient? A strategy based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMDC) classification is currently recommended with pembrolizumab + axitinib, cabozantinib + nivolumab, and lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (for all patients) or nivolumab + ipilimumab (for patients with intermediate or poor risk), which are the first-line treatment standards of care. However, several issues remain unresolved and require further investigation, such as the PD-L1 status, the relevance of possible options based on the patient's profile, and consideration of second-line and subsequent treatments.

Keywords: combinations; first-line treatment; immunotherapy; metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma; tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Yann-Alexandre Vano has received honoraria for advisory board from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, Janssen, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, and Roche, and travel expenses/accommodations from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, MSD, and Roche. Sylvain Ladoire has received research funding from Novartis, honoraria for consultancy from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, Roche, Ipsen, Janssen Oncology, and Sanofi, and travel expenses/accommodations from Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Astellas Pharma, Janssen Oncology, Ipsen, Bristol-Myers Squibb. Reza Elaidi has received honoraria for advisory board from Pfizer. Slimane Dermeche has received honoraria for advisory board from Pfizer. Jean-Christophe Eymard has received honoraria for consultancy from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ipsen, Novartis, Janssen, Astellas and Sanofi, and travel expenses/accommodations from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer. Sabrina Falkowski has received honoraria for advisory board from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Sanofi, MSD, Janssen, AstraZeneca and Astellas, and travel expenses/accommodations from Pfizer, Sanofi, MSD, and Janssen. Marine Gross-Goupil has received honoraria for advisory board/consultancy from Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Merck, Ipsen, and Novartis, and as a speaker from Roche and AstraZeneca, and travel expenses/accommodations from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Ipsen. Gabriel Malouf has received honoraria for consultancy from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astellas Pharma, and Ipsen. Berangere Narciso has received honoraria for advisory board from Janssen, Ipsen, Bristol-Myers Squibb and MSD. Christophe Sajous has received honoraria for advisory board from Pfizer, for consultancy from AstraZeneca, and as a speaker from Lilly. Sophie Tartas has received honoraria for advisory board from Pfizer. Eric Voog has received honoraria for advisory board from Pfizer. Alain Ravaud has received honoraria for advisory board/consultancy from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Ipsen, Merck, MSD, AstraZeneca and Roche, and travel expenses/accommodations from Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Ipsen, and MSD.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline update: Systemic first-line treatment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) [14]. ccRCC, clear cell renal cell cancer; EMA, European Medicines Agency; ESMO-MCBS, European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; IMDC, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium; MCBS, ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Scale; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. a ESMO-MCBS v1.1 score for new therapy/indication approved by the EMA or FDA. The score has been calculated by the ESMO-MCBS Working Group and validated by the ESMO Guidelines Committee; b FDA approved; not currently EMA approved.

References

    1. Lalani A.-K.A., McGregor B.A., Albiges L., Choueiri T.K., Motzer R., Powles T., Wood C., Bex A. Systemic Treatment of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in 2018: Current Paradigms, Use of Immunotherapy, and Future Directions. Eur. Urol. 2019;75:100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salgia N.J., Dara Y., Bergerot P., Salgia M., Pal S.K. The Changing Landscape of Management of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Current Treatment Options and Future Directions. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2019;20:41. doi: 10.1007/s11864-019-0638-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pardoll D.M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2012;12:252–264. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Massari F., Rizzo A., Mollica V., Rosellini M., Marchetti A., Ardizzoni A., Santoni M. Immune-based combinations for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Eur. J. Cancer. 2021;154:120–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzer R.J., Tannir N.M., McDermott D.F., Arén Frontera O., Melichar B., Choueiri T.K., Plimack E.R., Barthélémy P., Porta C., George S., et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:1277–1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. - DOI - PMC - PubMed