Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 1;35(1):42-47.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001077.

Critically appraising the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing donor allocation policy: adding life boats or rearranging the deck chairs?

Lauren K Truby  1 , Maryjane Farr  2 , Veli K Topkara  3
Affiliations
Review

Critically appraising the 2018 United Network for Organ Sharing donor allocation policy: adding life boats or rearranging the deck chairs?

Lauren K Truby et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: Due to the growing mismatch between donor supply and demand as well as unacceptably high transplant waitlist mortality, the heart organ allocation system was revised in October 2018. This review gives an overview of the changes in the new heart organ allocation system and its impact on heart transplant practice and outcomes in the United States.

Recent findings: The 2018 heart allocation system offers a 6-tiered policy and therefore prioritizes the sickest patients on the transplant waitlist. Patients supported with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices are prioritized as Status 1 or Status 2, resulting in increased utilization of this strategy. Patients supported with durable left ventricular assist devices have been prioritized as Status 3 or 4, which has resulted in decreased utilization of this strategy. Broader geographic sharing in the new heart allocation system has resulted in prolonged donor ischemic times. Overall, the new heart allocation system has resulted in significantly lower candidate waitlist mortality, shorter waitlist times, and higher incidence of transplantation.

Summary: The new United Network for Organ Sharing allocation policy confers significant advantages over the prior algorithm, allowing for decreased waitlist times and improved waitlist mortality without major impact on posttransplant survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest

References

    1. Meyer DM, Rogers JG, Edwards LB, et al. The future direction of the adult heart allocation system in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(1):44–54. - PubMed
    1. Goff RR, Uccellini K, Lindblad K, et al. A change of heart: Preliminary results of the US 2018 adult heart allocation revision. Am J Transplant. 2020;20(10):2781–2790. - PubMed

    2. ** Early outcome analysis of 2018 heart allocation system

    1. Kilic A, Mathier MA, Hickey GW, et al. Evolving Trends in Adult Heart Transplant With the 2018 Heart Allocation Policy Change. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6(2):159–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel JN, Chung JS, Seliem A, et al. Impact of heart transplant allocation change on competing waitlist outcomes among listing strategies. Clin Transplant. 2021;35(7):e14345. - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez MH, Acharya D, Lee S, et al. Improved survival after heart transplantation in patients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the new allocation system. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2021;40(2):149–157. - PubMed