Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr-Jun;37(2):110-116.
doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000603.

Perceptions of Nurses Who Are Second Victims in a Hospital Setting

Catherine Draus  1 , Therese B Mianecki, Hannah Musgrove, Danielle J Bastien, Dana Greggs, Christine Halash, Cheryl Larry-Osman Bellamy, Amber Lewis, Wendy Mackenzie
Affiliations

Perceptions of Nurses Who Are Second Victims in a Hospital Setting

Catherine Draus et al. J Nurs Care Qual. 2022 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: Second victims (SVs) are health care workers traumatized by unanticipated, adverse patient events. These experiences can have personal and professional effects on SVs. Research indicates that SVs experience inadequate support following adverse events.

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of nurses who identified as SVs and their awareness and use of supportive resources.

Methods: A convenience sample of nurses was surveyed, and SV responses were compared with those who did not identify as a SV. Responses were analyzed using nonparametric methods.

Results: One hundred fifty-nine (44.3%) of 359 participants identified as SVs. There was a significant relationship between work tenure and SVs (P = .009). A relationship was found between SVs and awareness and use of support resources, with debriefing being the preferred method after an event.

Conclusions: Adverse events trigger emotional trauma in SVs who require administrative awareness, support, and follow-up to minimize psychological trauma in the clinical nurse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Schroder K, Lamont RF, Jorgensen JS, Hvidt NC. Second victims need emotional support after adverse events: even in a just safety culture. BJOG. 2019;126(4):440–442. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15529
    1. Miller CS, Scott SD, Beck M. Second victims and mindfulness: a systematic review. J Patient Saf Risk Manag. 2019;24(3):108–117. doi:10.1177/2516043519838176
    1. Burlison JD, Quillivan RR, Scott SD, Johnson S, Hoffman JM. The effects of the second victim phenomenon on work-related outcomes: connecting self-reported caregiver distress to turnover intentions and absenteeism. J Patient Saf. 2021;17(3):195–199. doi:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000301
    1. Kable A, Kelly B, Adams J. Effects of adverse events in health care on acute care nurses in an Australian context: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2018;20(2):238–246. doi:10.1111/nhs.12409
    1. Lee S. Implementation of a Second Victim Program: HOPE Team . Capstone project. Gardner-Webb University. Published 2014. Accessed August 11, 2020. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025...

LinkOut - more resources