The Long-term Efficacy of Domiciliary Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- PMID: 34775737
- PMCID: PMC8743632
- DOI: 10.4046/trd.2021.0062
The Long-term Efficacy of Domiciliary Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Background: We evaluated the long-term effects of domiciliary noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) used to treat patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods: Databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials of COPD with NIPPV for longer than 1 year. Mortality rates were the primary outcome in this meta-analysis. The eight trials included in this study comprised data from 913 patients.
Results: The mortality rates for the NIPPV and control groups were 29% (118/414) and 36% (151/419), suggesting a statistically significant difference (risk ratio [RR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.95). Mortality rates were reduced with NIPPV in four trials that included stable COPD patients. There was no difference in admission, acute exacerbation and quality of life between the NIPPV and control groups. There was no significant difference in withdrawal rates between the two groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.36; p=0.94).
Conclusion: Maintaining long-term nocturnal NIPPV for more than 1 year, especially in patients with stable COPD, decreased the mortality rate, without increasing the withdrawal rate compared with long-term oxygen treatment.
Keywords: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Mortality; Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Association of Home Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation With Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):455-465. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22343. JAMA. 2020. PMID: 32016309 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome of domiciliary nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in restrictive and obstructive disorders.Thorax. 1995 Jun;50(6):604-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.6.604. Thorax. 1995. PMID: 7638799 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of domiciliary noninvasive ventilation on clinical outcomes in posthospital chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Ann Palliat Med. 2021 May;10(5):5137-5145. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2017. Epub 2021 Apr 30. Ann Palliat Med. 2021. PMID: 33977751
-
[Prospective randomized controlled clinical study of early use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in the treatment for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2005 Aug;17(8):477-80. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2005. PMID: 16105426 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Contemporary management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: scientific review.JAMA. 2003 Nov 5;290(17):2301-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.17.2301. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14600189 Review.
Cited by
-
Efficiency of a music-based intervention as an adjunct to the first noninvasive ventilation session in acute exacerbation of COPD: A randomized single-blind controlled trial protocol.PLoS One. 2025 Jul 23;20(7):e0328558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328558. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40700392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:347–65. - PubMed
-
- Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:817–22. - PubMed