Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 27:12:743504.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743504. eCollection 2021.

Body Mobility and Attention Networks in 6- to 7-Year-Old Children

Affiliations

Body Mobility and Attention Networks in 6- to 7-Year-Old Children

Joëlle Rosenbaum et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Learning in 6- to 7-year-old children is strongly influenced by three functions of attention: alertness, orienting, and executive control. These functions share a close relationship with body mobility, such as the posture adopted or a request to stay still during tasks. The aim of this study (ClinicalTrials.gov) was to analyze the influence of body posture (standing versus sitting) and the influence of these imposed postures compared to a free body mobility on attention functions in 6- to 7-year-old children. Twenty-one children (11 girls) with a mean age of 6.7±0.6years performed the Attention Network Test for Children in three-body mobility conditions: sitting still, standing still, and free to move. Three attentional scores were calculated which would separately reflect performance of alertness, orienting, and executive control. Overall, no difference in alertness performance was found between the three bodily mobility conditions. In addition, our results suggest a general poor orienting performance in children, whatever the body mobility condition, which might be related to their young age. Finally, children improved their executive control performance when they stood still, probably due to an improvement in arousal and mental state.

Keywords: alertness; attention networks; body mobility; executive control; orienting; posture; school-aged children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of children not moving (0), moving between 0 and 1, 1 and 5, 5 and 10 and more than 10s per minute for each type of movement in each body mobility condition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Alerting score, orienting score, and conflict score in each body mobility condition. Error bars represent the mean absolute difference. *p<0.05.

References

    1. Abou Khalil G., Doré-Mazars K., Senot P., Wang D. P., Legrand A. (2020). Is it better to sit down, stand up or walk when performing memory and arithmetic activities? Exp. Brain Res. 238, 2487–2496. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05858-z, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amerise I. L., Tarsitano A. (2015). Correction methods for ties in rank correlations. J. Appl. Stat. 42, 2584–2596. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2015.1043870 - DOI
    1. Aminian S., Hinckson E. A., Stewart T. (2015). Modifying the classroom environment to increase standing and reduce sitting. Build. Res. Inf. 43, 631–645. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1058093 - DOI
    1. Assaiante C., Amblard B. (1995). An ontogenetic model for the sensorimotor organization of balance control in humans. Hum. Mov. Sci. 14, 13–43. doi: 10.1016/0167-9457(94)00048-J - DOI
    1. Aston-Jones G., Cohen J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources