Response: Commentary: Distrust, False Cues, and Below-Chance Deception Detection Accuracy: Commentary on Stel et al. (2020) and Further Reflections on (Un)Conscious Lie Detection From the Perspective of Truth-Default Theory
- PMID: 34777168
- PMCID: PMC8579807
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763218
Response: Commentary: Distrust, False Cues, and Below-Chance Deception Detection Accuracy: Commentary on Stel et al. (2020) and Further Reflections on (Un)Conscious Lie Detection From the Perspective of Truth-Default Theory
Keywords: consciousness; deception; deception cues; distrust; lie detection.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Comment on
-
Distrust, False Cues, and Below-Chance Deception Detection Accuracy: Commentary on Stel et al. (2020) and Further Reflections on (Un)Conscious Lie Detection From the Perspective of Truth-Default Theory.Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 21;12:642359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642359. eCollection 2021. Front Psychol. 2021. PMID: 34366964 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Buller D. B., Strzyzewski K. D., Comstock J. (1991). Interpersonal deception: I. Deceivers' reactions to receivers' suspicions and probing. Commun. Monographs 58, 1–24. 10.1080/03637759109376211 - DOI
-
- Burgoon J. K., Buller D. B., Ebesu A. S., Rockwell P. (1994). Interpersonal deception: V. accuracy in deception detection. Commun. Monographs 61, 303–325. 10.1080/03637759409376340 - DOI
-
- Hartwig M., Bond C. F. (2014). Lie detection from multiple cues: a meta-analysis. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 28, 661–676. 10.1002/acp.3052 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources