Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 6;9(35):11616-11634.
doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03005. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

Recovery of Critical Metals from Aqueous Sources

Affiliations

Recovery of Critical Metals from Aqueous Sources

Serife E Can Sener et al. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. .

Abstract

Critical metals, identified from supply, demand, imports, and market factors, include rare earth elements (REE), platinum group metals, precious metals, and other valuable metals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, and uranium. Extraction of metals from U.S. saline aqueous, emphasizing saline, sources is explored as an alternative to hardrock ore mining. Potential aqueous sources include seawater, desalination brines, oil-and-gas produced waters, geothermal aquifers, and acid mine drainage, among others. A feasibility assessment reveals opportunities for recovery of lithium, strontium, magnesium, and several REE from select sources, in quantities significant for U.S. manufacturing and for reduction of U.S. reliance on international supply chains. This is a conservative assessment given that water quality data are lacking for a significant number of critical metals in certain sources. The technology landscape for extraction and recovery of critical metals from aqueous sources is explored, identifying relevant processes along with knowledge gaps. Our analysis indicates that aqueous mining would result in much lower environmental impacts on water, air, and land than ore mining. Preliminary assessments of the economics and energy consumption of recovery show potential for recovery of critical metals.

Keywords: Critical Metals; Extraction Technologies; Mining Impacts; Saline Water Sources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
USA-Centric Criticality Index, C (2018 Data).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Aqueous-Phase Saline Sources for Mining of Critical Elements.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Feasibility to Meet Global Demand of Critical Metals from Aqueous Sources
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Extraction and Concentration of Targeted Constituents by Ion-Selective Sorption, Electro-Sorption, and Membrane Processes.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Production cost (blue) and market price (red) of critical metals (within 0 – 100 % scale are median values (solid line) and 25, 50, 75, and 100 percentile values).
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Energy inputs to mining and processing of minerals and metals (data from).

References

    1. The White House. Federal Strategy to Ensure Secure and Reliable Supplies of Critical Minerals https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidential-executive-o... (accessed Dec 22, 2020).
    1. USGS. 35 Minerals Deemed Critical to U.S. National Security and the Economy; 2018.
    1. The White House. Executive Order on Addressing the Threat to the Domestic Supply Chain from Reliance on Critical Minerals from Foreign Adversaries https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-10-05/pdf/2020-22064.pdf (accessed Jun 30, 2021).
    1. The White House. Executive Order on America’s Supply Chains https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/02/24... (accessed Jun 30, 2021).
    1. Blengini GA; Nuss P; Dewulf J; Nita V; Talens Peiró L; Vidal-Legaz B; Latunussa C; Mancini L; Blagoeva D; Pennington D; Pellegrini M; Van Maercke A; Solar S; Grohol M; Ciupagea C EU Methodology for Critical Raw Materials Assessment: Policy Needs and Proposed Solutions for Incremental Improvements. Resour. Policy 2017, 53, 12–19. 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.05.008. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources