Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 28:11:770561.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.770561. eCollection 2021.

Immunosuppression in Glioblastoma: Current Understanding and Therapeutic Implications

Affiliations
Review

Immunosuppression in Glioblastoma: Current Understanding and Therapeutic Implications

Benjamin T Himes et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults an carries and carries a terrible prognosis. The current regiment of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy has remained largely unchanged in recent years as new therapeutic approaches have struggled to demonstrate benefit. One of the most challenging hurdles to overcome in developing novel treatments is the profound immune suppression found in many GBM patients. This limits the utility of all manner of immunotherapeutic agents, which have revolutionized the treatment of a number of cancers in recent years, but have failed to show similar benefit in GBM therapy. Understanding the mechanisms of tumor-mediated immune suppression in GBM is critical to the development of effective novel therapies, and reversal of this effect may prove key to effective immunotherapy for GBM. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of tumor-mediated immune suppression in GBM in both the local tumor microenvironment and systemically. We also discuss the effects of current GBM therapy on the immune system. We specifically explore some of the downstream effectors of tumor-driven immune suppression, particularly myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and other immunosuppressive monocytes, and the manner by which GBM induces their formation, with particular attention to the role of GBM-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs). Lastly, we briefly review the current state of immunotherapy for GBM and discuss additional hurdles to overcome identification and implementation of effective therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: extracellular vesicles; glioblastoma; immunosuppression; immunotherapy; myeloid - derived suppressor cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of proposed mechanisms of GBM immunosuppression. Immunosuppressive effects are categorized as either systemic (on left) or local (right). Systemic effects are exerted on either the blood and lymphopoietic systems (including the bone marrow) or secondary lymphoid organs, including the spleen. Local effects include effects on both the adaptive and innate immune systems. Specific examples are included in each panel.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of mechanisms of induction of immunosuppressive monocytes. Induction of immunosuppressive monocytes by GBM tumor cells can proceed through a number of different mechanisms, including direct cell surface-mediated signaling, uptake of proteins with subsequent cytosolic effects, or signaling by tumor-derived small RNAs. Tumor-derived EVs are capable of signaling by any of these mechanisms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Induction of immunosuppression by immunosuppressive monocytes. Immunosuppressive monocytes and MDSCs potentially exert both local and systemic effects leading to immune suppression. This can include direct T cell inhibition and release of immunosuppressive cytokines in the tumor milieu (top panels), or inhibition of T cell maturation or inhibition in the primary and secondary lymphoid tissues (bottom panels).

References

    1. Koshy M, Villano JL, Dolecek TA, Howard A, Mahmood U, Chmura SJ, et al. . Improved Survival Time Trends for Glioblastoma Using the SEER 17 Population-Based Registries. J Neurooncol (2012) 107:207–12. doi: 10.1007/s11060-011-0738-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. . Radiotherapy Plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. N Engl J Med (2005) 352:987–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A, Read W, Steinberg D, Lhermitte B, et al. . Effect of Tumor-Treating Fields Plus Maintenance Temozolomide vs Maintenance Temozolomide Alone on Survival in Patients With Glioblastoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA (2017) 318:2306–16. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A, Hodi FS, Hwu WJ, Kefford R, et al. . Safety and Tumor Responses With Lambrolizumab (Anti-PD-1) in Melanoma. N Engl J Med (2013) 369:134–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305133 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. . Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma Without BRAF Mutation. N Engl J Med (2015) 372:320–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources