Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 28:8:724026.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.724026. eCollection 2021.

Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Affiliations

Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

Per Lindström et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair, when performed correctly, may reduce the risk for pain and discomfort in the postoperative period thus enabling shorter hospital stay. The aim of the present study was to evaluate postoperative pain following robot-assisted laparoscopic repair. The approach was selected after an intraoperative decision to complete the repair as: (1). Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP); (2). Trans-Abdominal RetroMuscular (TARM) repair; or (3). Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repair depending on anatomical conditions. Methods: Twenty ventral hernia repairs, 8 primary and 12 incisional, were included between 18th Dec 2017 and 11th Nov 2019. There were 8 women, mean age was 60.3 years, and mean diameter of the defect was 3.8 cm. The repairs were performed at Södersjukhuset (Southern General Hospital, Stockholm) using the Da Vinci Si Surgical System®. Sixteen repairs were completed with the TAPP technique, 2 with the TARM technique, and 2 as IPOM repair. Results: Mean hospital stay was 1.05 days. No postoperative infection was seen, and no recurrence was seen at 1 year. At the 30-day follow-up, fifteen patients (75%) rated their pain as zero or pain that was easily ignored, according to the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire. After 1 year no one had pain that was not easily ignored. Conclusion: The present study shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia is feasible and safe. More randomized controlled trials are needed to show that the potential benefits in terms of shorter operation times, earlier discharge, and less postoperative pain motivate the extra costs associated with the robot technique.

Keywords: intraperitoneal onlay mesh; pain; robot-assisted laparoscopy; transabdominal preperitoneal repair; transabdominal retromuscular repair; ventral hernia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Ezra E, Österberg J, Montgomery A. Quality of life and surgical outcome 1 year after open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: PROLOVE: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. (2016) 263:244–50. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001305 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reinpold W, Schröder M, Berger C, Stoltenberg W, Köckerling F. MILOS and EMILOS repair of primary umbilical and epigastric hernias. Hernia. (2019) 23:935–44. 10.1007/s10029-019-02056-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Orthopoulos G, Kudsi OY. Feasibility of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. (2018) 28:434–8. 10.1089/lap.2017.0595 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li B, Qin C, Bittner R. Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEA) technique for primary ventral hernia repair. Surg Endosc. (2020) 34:3734–41. 10.1007/s00464-020-07575-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK, Wilson TD, Wei S, Pedroza C, et al. . Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. BMJ. (2020) 370:m2457. 10.1136/bmj.m2457 - DOI - PMC - PubMed