Impact of remote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learning outcomes
- PMID: 34778531
- PMCID: PMC8263093
- DOI: 10.1186/s41239-021-00272-z
Impact of remote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learning outcomes
Abstract
Access and personalized instruction required for laboratory education can be highly compromised due to regulatory constraints in times such as COVID-19 pandemic or resource shortages at other times. This directly impacts the student engagement and immersion that are necessary for conceptual and procedural understanding for scientific experimentation. While online and remote laboratories have potential to address the aforementioned challenges, theoretical perspectives of laboratory learning outcomes are critical to enhance their impact and are sparsely examined in the literature. Using Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), this paper addresses the gap through a case study on Universal Testing Machine (UTM). By comparing physical (PL-UTM) and remotely triggerable (RT-UTM) laboratory platforms, the structure and interactions as per TDT are analysed. Characterization of interactivity between remote learners and instructors disclose indicative parameters that affect transactional distances and aid in conceptual understanding in remote laboratory learning environment. An extensive pedagogical study through development of two instruments towards assessing conceptual understanding and perception of platform effectiveness that was conducted both on physical laboratory and RT-UTM showed: (1) remote users conducted experiments 3 times more frequently (2) completed assignments in 30% less time and (3) had over 200% improvement in scores when RT-UTM platform was integrated into mainstream learning.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41239-021-00272-z.
Keywords: Interactivity; Learning outcome; Mechanics of solids; Remote trigger; Transactional distance theory; UTM; Virtual labs.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Figures














References
-
- ABET (2018). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018–2019.
-
- Achuthan, K., Francis, S. P., & Diwakar, S. (2017). Augmented reflective learning and knowledge retention perceived among students in classrooms involving virtual laboratories. Education and Information Technologies,22(6), 2825–2855.
-
- Achuthan, K., Freeman, J. D., Nedungadi, P., Mohankumar, U., Varghese, A., Vasanthakumari, A. M., et al. (2020). Remote triggered dual-axis solar irradiance measurement system. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,56(2), 1742–1751.
-
- Achuthan, K., Kolil, V. K., & Diwakar, S. (2018). Using virtual laboratories in chemistry classrooms as interactive tools towards modifying alternate conceptions in molecular symmetry. Education and Information Technologies,23(6), 2499–2515.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous