Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;18(1):38.
doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00272-z. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

Impact of remote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learning outcomes

Affiliations

Impact of remote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learning outcomes

Krishnashree Achuthan et al. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2021.

Abstract

Access and personalized instruction required for laboratory education can be highly compromised due to regulatory constraints in times such as COVID-19 pandemic or resource shortages at other times. This directly impacts the student engagement and immersion that are necessary for conceptual and procedural understanding for scientific experimentation. While online and remote laboratories have potential to address the aforementioned challenges, theoretical perspectives of laboratory learning outcomes are critical to enhance their impact and are sparsely examined in the literature. Using Transactional Distance Theory (TDT), this paper addresses the gap through a case study on Universal Testing Machine (UTM). By comparing physical (PL-UTM) and remotely triggerable (RT-UTM) laboratory platforms, the structure and interactions as per TDT are analysed. Characterization of interactivity between remote learners and instructors disclose indicative parameters that affect transactional distances and aid in conceptual understanding in remote laboratory learning environment. An extensive pedagogical study through development of two instruments towards assessing conceptual understanding and perception of platform effectiveness that was conducted both on physical laboratory and RT-UTM showed: (1) remote users conducted experiments 3 times more frequently (2) completed assignments in 30% less time and (3) had over 200% improvement in scores when RT-UTM platform was integrated into mainstream learning.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41239-021-00272-z.

Keywords: Interactivity; Learning outcome; Mechanics of solids; Remote trigger; Transactional distance theory; UTM; Virtual labs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Transactional distance theory framework for RT-UTM
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Specimen loaded in the UTM for experimentation. a Specimen with circular hole and b specimen with notch
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Design of RT-UTM platform
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Architecture of remote triggered experimental setup
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Schematic representation of instrumentation hardware
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Client-side UI for Young’s modulus experiment
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Client-side UI to study stress concentrations on a plate with a hole
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Specimen with strain gauges loaded in the UTM for Poisson’s Ratio Experiment
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Client-side UI to study stress concentrations on a plate with a notch
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Strain gauge locations on specimen for St. Venant’s Principle
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Block diagram of VL-LMS
Fig. 12
Fig. 12
Methodology for assessing RT experimentation effect
Fig. 13
Fig. 13
A Box plot showing the range of scores of 14 CUQ of Group A and Group B. Percentages in the brackets showing the percentage increase of average score in each tests. B Figure showing the percentage of students who got correct answers for each MCQs in each tests
Fig. 14
Fig. 14
Effectiveness of RT-UTM and PL-UTM from the feedback data

References

    1. ABET (2018). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, 2018–2019.
    1. Achuthan, K., Francis, S. P., & Diwakar, S. (2017). Augmented reflective learning and knowledge retention perceived among students in classrooms involving virtual laboratories. Education and Information Technologies,22(6), 2825–2855.
    1. Achuthan, K., Freeman, J. D., Nedungadi, P., Mohankumar, U., Varghese, A., Vasanthakumari, A. M., et al. (2020). Remote triggered dual-axis solar irradiance measurement system. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications,56(2), 1742–1751.
    1. Achuthan, K., Kolil, V. K., & Diwakar, S. (2018). Using virtual laboratories in chemistry classrooms as interactive tools towards modifying alternate conceptions in molecular symmetry. Education and Information Technologies,23(6), 2499–2515.
    1. Aguilera-Hermida, A.P. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to covid-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open,1(100), 011. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources