Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 22:3:737402.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.737402. eCollection 2021.

Can Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) Symptom Scores Be Converted to Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) Scores and Vice Versa? Findings From the Toronto Concussion Study

Affiliations

Can Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) Symptom Scores Be Converted to Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) Scores and Vice Versa? Findings From the Toronto Concussion Study

Laura Kathleen Langer et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Background: The Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) are widely used self-report tools assessing the type, number, and severity of concussion symptoms. There are overlapping symptoms and domains, though they are scored differently. The SCAT consists of 22 questions with a 7-point Likert scale for a total possible score 132. The RPQ has 16 questions and a 5-point Likert scale for a total of 64 possible points. Being able to convert between the two scores would facilitate comparison of results in the concussion literature. Objectives: To develop equations to convert scores on the SCAT to the RPQ and vice versa. Methods: Adults (17-85 years) diagnosed with a concussion at a referring emergency department were seen in the Hull-Ellis Concussion and Research Clinic, a rapid access concussion clinic at Toronto Rehab-University Health Network (UHN) Toronto Canada, within 7 days of injury. The RPQ and SCAT symptom checklists as well as demographic questionnaires were administered to all participants at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16. Results: 215 participants had 1,168 matched RPQ and SCAT assessments. Total scores of the RPQ and the SCAT had a rho = 0.91 (p < 0.001); correlations were lower for sub-scores of specific symptom domains (range 0.74-0.87, p < 0.001 for all domain comparisons). An equation was derived to calculate SCAT scores using the number and severity of symptoms on the RPQ. Estimated scores were within 3 points of the observed total score on the SCAT. A second equation was derived to calculate the RPQ from the proportion weighted total score of the SCAT. This equation estimated corresponding scores within 3 points of the observed score on the RPQ. Conclusions: The RPQ and SCAT symptom checklists total scores are highly correlated and can be used to estimate the total score on the corresponding assessment. The symptom subdomains are also strongly correlated between the 2 scales however not as strongly correlated as the total score. The equations will enable researchers and clinicians to quickly convert between the scales and to directly compare concussion research findings.

Keywords: Rivermead Post-concussion Questionnaire; Sport Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT5); concussion; conversion equation; mild traumatic brain injuries; sports related concussion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spearman correlation between Rivermead post-Concussion Symptoms Score (RPQ) total score and Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) total score. Rho = 0.91 p < 0.0001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spearman correlation between the number of symptoms endorsed on the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) and the number of symptoms endorsed on the Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT). Rho = 0.77 p < 0.0001.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted Sports Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT) scores plotted against the actual SCAT scores.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted Rivermead post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) scores plotted against actual RPQ scores.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Asken B. M., Snyder A. R., Glugston J. R., Gaynor L. S., Sullan M. J., Baueer R. M. (2017). Concussion-like symptom reporting in non-concussed collegiate athletes. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 32, 936–971. 10.1093/arclin/acx018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balasundaram A. P., Athens J., Schneiders A. G., McCrory P., Sullivan S. J. (2017). Psychological and lifestyle factors that influence the serial reporting of postconcussion-like symptoms in a non-concussed population. PMandR. 9, 866–873. 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.01.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Downey R. I., Hutchison M. G., Comper P. (2018). Determining sensitivity and specificity of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 (SCAT3) components in university athletes. Brain Inj. 32, 1345–1352. 10.1080/02699052.2018.1484166 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eyres S., Carey A., Gilworth G., Neurman V., Tennant A. (2005). Construct validity and reliability of the rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 19, 878–887. 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa - DOI - PubMed
    1. King N. S., Crawford S., Wenden F. J., Moss N. E., Wade D. T. (1995). The rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J. Neurol. 242, 587–592. 10.1007/BF00868811 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources