Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 4:11:100233.
doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100233. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study

Affiliations

Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study

Erich Flammer et al. Lancet Reg Health Eur. .

Abstract

Background: On 23 July 2018, the German Constitutional Court decided that mechanical restraint in psychiatric patients lasting longer than 30 minutes requires a judge's immediate decision. On the same day, the German Association for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy published its guideline on the prevention of coercion and violence. The registry for coercive measures in the federal state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, available since 2015 and comprising all 32 hospitals licensed to admit involuntary patients, has made it possible to evaluate the effect of the legal change, considered the strongest intervention ever in Germany to reduce coercion.

Methods: We analysed the mean percentage of patients subjected to coercive measures and the mean cumulative duration of these interventions in ICD-10 diagnostic groups in psychiatric hospitals from 2017 compared to 2019 among a total of 233,0273 admissions.

Findings: The percentage of patients subjected to any kind of freedom-restricting coercion decreased from 6·6% in 2017 to 5·8% in 2019 (p = 0·000). Accordingly, the percentage of patients subjected to mechanical restraint decreased from 4·8% to 3·6% in 2019 (p = 0·000). At the same time, the percentage of patients subjected to seclusion increased from 2·9% to 3·3% (p = 0·000). The median cumulated duration of restraint and seclusion per affected case decreased from 12·5 to 11·9 hrs (p = 0·001).

Interpretation: There is clear evidence that a strong legal intervention was effective in reducing the use of coercive measures under routine conditions.

Funding: The registry is funded by the Ministry of Social Welfare and Integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no conflicting interests to disclose.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Steinert T, Birk M, Flammer E. Subjective distress after seclusion or mechanical restraint: One- year follow-up of a randomized controlled study. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64 - PubMed
    1. Rossa-Roccor V, Schmid P, Steinert T. Victimization of people with severe mental illness outside and within the mental health care system: Results on prevalence and risk factors from a multicenter study. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.563860. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Szmukler G. Involuntary detention and treatment: Are we edging toward a “paradigm shift”? Schizophr Bull. 2020;26:231–235. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirsch S, Steinert T. Measures to avoid coercion in psychiatry and their efficacy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2019;116:336–343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belanger S. The “S&R challenge”: Reducing the use of seclusion and restraint in a state psychiatric hospital. J Healthc Qual. 2001;23:19–24. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources