Spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum and method for analyzing detector DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images
- PMID: 34779519
- DOI: 10.1002/mp.15344
Spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum and method for analyzing detector DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images
Abstract
Purpose: Scintillators and photoconductors used in energy integrating detectors (EIDs) have inherent variations in their imaging response to single-detected X-rays due to variations in X-ray energy deposition and secondary quanta generation and transport, which degrades DQE(f). The imaging response of X-ray scintillators to single X-rays may be recorded and studied using single X-ray imaging (SXI) experiments; however, no method currently exists for relating SXI experimental results to EID DQE(f). This work proposes a general analytical framework for computing and analyzing the DQE(f) performance of EIDs from single X-ray image ensembles using a spatial frequency-dependent pulse-height spectrum.
Methods: A spatial frequency (f)-dependent gain, , is defined as the Fourier transform of the imaging response of an EID to a single-detected X-ray. A f-dependent pulse-height spectrum, , is defined as the 2D probability density function of over the complex plane. is used to define a f-dependent Swank factor, AS (f), which fully characterizes the DQE(f) degradation due to single X-ray noise. AS (f) is analyzed in terms of its degradation due to Swank noise, variations in the frequency-dependent attenuation of , and noise in which occurs due to variations in the asymmetry in each single X-ray's imaging response. Three example imaging systems are simulated to demonstrate the impact of depth-dependent variation in , remote energy deposition, and a finite number of secondary quanta, on , AS (f), MTF(f), and NPS(f)/NPS(0), which are computed from ensembles of single X-ray images. The same is also demonstrated by simulating a realistic imaging system; that is, a Gd2 O2 S-based EID. Using the latter imaging system, the convergence of AS (f) estimates is investigated as a function of the number of detected X-rays per ensemble.
Results: Depth-dependent variation resulted in AS (f) degradation exclusively due to depth-dependent optical Swank noise and the Lubberts effect. Conversely, the majority of AS (f) degradation caused by remote energy deposition and finite secondary quanta occurred due to variations in . When using input X-ray energies below the K-edge of Gd, variations in the frequency-dependent attenuation of accounted for the majority of AS (f) degradation in the GOS-based EID, and very little Swank noise and variations in were observed. Above the K-edge, however, AS (f) degradation due to Swank noise and variations in greatly increased. The convergence of AS (f) was limited by variation in ; imaging systems with more variation in required more detected X-rays per ensemble.
Conclusions: An analytical framework is proposed that generalizes the pulse-height spectrum and Swank factor to arbitrary f. The impact of single X-ray noise sources, such as the Lubberts effect, remote energy deposition, and finite secondary quanta on detector performance, may be represented using , and quantified using AS (f). The approach may be used to compute MTF(f), NPS(f), and DQE(f) from ensembles of single X-ray images and provides an additional tool to analyze proposed EID designs.
Keywords: detective quantum efficiency; energy integrating detector; modulation transfer function; noise power spectrum; pulse-height spectrum.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of CsI:Tl and Gd2 O2 S:Tb indirect flat panel detector x-ray imaging performance in front- and back-irradiation geometries.Med Phys. 2019 Nov;46(11):4857-4868. doi: 10.1002/mp.13791. Epub 2019 Sep 23. Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 31461532 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative analysis of OTF, NPS, and DQE in energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.Med Phys. 2010 Dec;37(12):6480-95. doi: 10.1118/1.3505014. Med Phys. 2010. PMID: 21302803 Free PMC article.
-
Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: frequency-dependent Swank noise.Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3194-204. doi: 10.1118/1.2936412. Med Phys. 2008. PMID: 18697544
-
Radiation Detectors and Sensors in Medical Imaging.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;24(19):6251. doi: 10.3390/s24196251. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39409289 Free PMC article. Review.
-
X-ray Imaging.2018 Aug 3. In: Maier A, Steidl S, Christlein V, Hornegger J, editors. Medical Imaging Systems: An Introductory Guide [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018. Chapter 7. 2018 Aug 3. In: Maier A, Steidl S, Christlein V, Hornegger J, editors. Medical Imaging Systems: An Introductory Guide [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018. Chapter 7. PMID: 31725228 Free Books & Documents. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cowen AR, Davies AG, Sivananthan MU. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Clin Radiol. 2008;63(10):1073-1085.
-
- Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW, Martinez AA. Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phy. 2002;53(5):1337-1349.
-
- Siewerdsen JH. Cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: from image science to image-guided surgery. Nucl. Instrum. and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 2011;648(1):S241-S250.
-
- Howansky A, Mishchenko A, Léveillé S, et al. Initial characterization of a hybrid direct-indirect active matrix flat panel imager for digital radiography. Medical Imaging 2020: Physics of Medical Imaging. 2020. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 2020.
-
- Scheuermann JR, Howansky A, Hansroul M, Léveillé S, Tanioka K, Zhao W. Toward scintillator high-gain avalanche rushing photoconductor active matrix flat panel imager (SHARP-AMFPI): initial fabrication and characterization. Med Phys. 2018;45:794-802.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous