A fertility app for two? Women's perspectives on sharing conceptive fertility work with male partners
- PMID: 34779718
- DOI: 10.1080/13691058.2021.2002414
A fertility app for two? Women's perspectives on sharing conceptive fertility work with male partners
Abstract
Smartphone apps for monitoring bodily signs of ovulation are growing in popularity and becoming increasingly important tools for facilitating or preventing pregnancy. This article explores heterosexual women's experiences of using fertility apps in the context of trying to conceive. Specifically, it focuses on a feature of fertility apps that enables women to share information about fertility with a male partner. This feature is frequently lauded by apps as providing an opportunity for partners to be more actively involved in the work of trying to conceive. With this focus, the article makes two key contributions to the emerging literature on fertility apps. Firstly, it situates narratives in apps that promote the shared responsibility for conception as part of a pre-parenting culture that values a shared commitment to (future) parenthood. Secondly, drawing on interviews with women in the UK who had used fertility apps, it explores women's perspectives on involving their male partners in pregnancy planning. Rather than redistributing conceptive fertility work, women's experiences reveal how cultural assumptions about heterosexuality and 'natural conception' significantly curtail their ability to engage partners in fertility tracking. As a result, the gendered divisions of fertility work are reconfigured in the new sociotechnical context of fertility app use.
Keywords: conception; digital health; fertility awareness methods; fertility work; heterosexuality.
Similar articles
-
Fertility and digital technology: narratives of using smartphone app 'Natural Cycles' while trying to conceive.Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jan;43(1):116-132. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13199. Epub 2020 Nov 4. Sociol Health Illn. 2021. PMID: 33147647 Free PMC article.
-
Women's perspectives on smartphone apps for fertility tracking and predicting conception: a mixed methods study.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021 Apr;26(2):119-127. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1874336. Epub 2021 Feb 12. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021. PMID: 33576699
-
A Critical Appraisal of Fertility and Menstrual Tracking Apps for the iPhone.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 May;42(5):583-590. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.023. Epub 2019 Dec 25. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020. PMID: 31882289
-
Evaluation of Mobile Applications Intended to Aid in Conception Using a Systematic Review Framework.Ann Pharmacother. 2020 Feb;54(2):178-186. doi: 10.1177/1060028019876890. Epub 2019 Sep 11. Ann Pharmacother. 2020. PMID: 31510755
-
Review of Mobile Apps for Women With Anxiety in Pregnancy: Maternity Care Professionals' Guide to Locating and Assessing Anxiety Apps.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 23;24(3):e31831. doi: 10.2196/31831. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35319482 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Un-tracking menopause: How not using self-tracking technologies mediates women's self-experiences in menopause.Health (London). 2024 Sep;28(5):653-672. doi: 10.1177/13634593231204171. Epub 2023 Nov 10. Health (London). 2024. PMID: 37947360 Free PMC article.
-
Flowing data: women's views and experiences on privacy and data security when using menstrual cycle tracking apps.Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025 May 17;3:oqaf011. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqaf011. eCollection 2025. Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40463855 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials