Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2022 Apr;24(4):241-248.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0362.

Discontinued Use of the Loop Insulin Dosing System: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Affiliations
Observational Study

Discontinued Use of the Loop Insulin Dosing System: A Mixed-Methods Investigation

Jessie J Wong et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Loop is an open-source automated insulin dosing system that allows users unrivaled control over system settings that affect future glucose prediction. Thousands use Loop, but little is known about those who discontinue. Methods: In a large observational study, 874 Loop participants completed surveys and provided glycemic data, 46 (5.3%) of those self-identified as discontinuing Loop use during the observation window, 45 completed a discontinued use survey, 22 provided system settings data, and 19 participated in semistructured interviews about their discontinuation. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed. Results: Older age and not trusting Loop were associated with discontinued use, although no other demographic or clinical characteristics were significant correlates. The most endorsed reasons were "I decided to try something else" (27.8%) followed by "It just didn't help as much as I thought it would" (22.2%). Qualitative analyses revealed prominent themes centered upon mental and emotional burden and adjusting settings. Other reasons for discontinued use included fear of disapproval of Loop use from diabetes provider, barriers to acquiring component devices, a desire to try new/different technologies, concerns that Loop could not accommodate specific exercise or low insulin dose regimens, and worry about Loop use during pregnancy. It was noted that burdens might be alleviated by enhanced technical assistance and expert guidance. Conclusions: Although the majority of individuals in the Loop observational study continued use, those who discontinued reported similar challenges. Technical support and education specific to setting calculations could expand Loop benefits, alleviate burden, and support sustained use among new Loop users. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03838900).

Keywords: Automation; Diabetes mellitus; Insulin/administration and dosage; Type 1/drug therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Scatterplot of CIR, ISF, and basal ratios of actual settings versus calculated settings with TIR. CIR, carbohydrate-to-insulin ratio; ISF, insulin sensitivity factor; TIR, time-in-range.

References

    1. Lum J, Bailey R, Barnes-Lomen V, et al. : A real-world prospective study of the safety and effectiveness of the loop open source automated insulin delivery system. Diabetes Technol Ther 2021;23:367–375. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal RA, Basina M, Maahs DM, et al. : One year clinical experience of the First Commercial Hybrid Closed-Loop System. Diabetes Care 2019;42:2190–2196. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lal RA, Quinlan A, Desborough L, Nykaza E: Optimizing formulas for basal, carb ratio and sensitivity factor for predictive controllers: lessons learned from loop. Oral Presentation presented at the: advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/dia.2021.2525.abstracts (accessed November 18, 2021).
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, et al. : Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:246–252. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J: When Is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care 2012;35:259–264. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data