Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):e051065.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051065.

Which outcomes are most important to measure in patients with COVID-19 and how and when should these be measured? Development of an international standard set of outcomes measures for clinical use in patients with COVID-19: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) COVID-19 Working Group

Affiliations

Which outcomes are most important to measure in patients with COVID-19 and how and when should these be measured? Development of an international standard set of outcomes measures for clinical use in patients with COVID-19: a report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) COVID-19 Working Group

William H Seligman et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread morbidity and mortality with the consequences expected to be felt for many years. Significant variation exists in the care even of similar patients with COVID-19, including treatment practices within and between institutions. Outcome measures vary among clinical trials on the same therapies. Understanding which therapies are of most value is not possible unless consensus can be reached on which outcomes are most important to measure. Furthermore, consensus on the most important outcomes may enable patients to monitor and track their care, and may help providers to improve the care they offer through quality improvement. To develop a standardised minimum set of outcomes for clinical care, the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) assembled a working group (WG) of 28 volunteers, including health professionals, patients and patient representatives.

Design: A list of outcomes important to patients and professionals was generated from a systematic review of the published literature using the MEDLINE database, from review of outcomes being measured in ongoing clinical trials, from a survey distributed to patients and patient networks, and from previously published ICHOM standard sets in other disease areas. Using an online-modified Delphi process, the WG selected outcomes of greatest importance.

Results: The outcomes considered by the WG to be most important were selected and categorised into five domains: (1) functional status and quality of life, (2) mental functioning, (3) social functioning, (4) clinical outcomes and (5) symptoms. The WG identified demographic and clinical variables for use as case-mix risk adjusters. These included baseline demographics, clinical factors and treatment-related factors.

Conclusion: Implementation of these consensus recommendations could help institutions to monitor, compare and improve the quality and delivery of care to patients with COVID-19. Their consistent definition and collection could also broaden the implementation of more patient-centric clinical outcomes research.

Keywords: COVID-19; international health services; quality in healthcare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline and data collection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Follow-up timeline and data collection guidance. PROM, patient-reported outcome measure.

References

    1. World Health Organization . WHO coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Available: https://covid19.who.int/
    1. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F, et al. . Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020;324:603–5. 10.1001/jama.2020.12603 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azoulay E, de Waele J, Ferrer R, et al. . International variation in the management of severe COVID-19 patients. Crit Care 2020;24:486. 10.1186/s13054-020-03194-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Qiu R, Wei X, Zhao M. Outcome reporting from protocols of clinical trials of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. medRxiv 2020.
    1. Wong AW, Shah AS, Johnston JC, et al. . Patient-Reported outcome measures after COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Eur Respir J 2020;56:2003276. 10.1183/13993003.03276-2020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types