Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;35(2):312-337.
doi: 10.1111/jar.12953. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Psychosocial interventions for older people with intellectual disabilities and the role of support staff: A systematic review

Affiliations

Psychosocial interventions for older people with intellectual disabilities and the role of support staff: A systematic review

Marloes Thalen et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The life expectancy of people with intellectual disabilities has increased. The implications of ageing have resulted in changes in their support needs and challenges to support staff. Access to evidence based strategies for support staff providing care to elderly with intellectual disabilities remains scarce. A systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of available psychosocial interventions.

Methods: Four databases were searched and assessed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A narrative, integrative method of analysis was conducted to synthesise quantitative and qualitative data.

Results: The 36 studies included in the review reported on interventions aimed at either identifying and meeting the needs or perceptions of older individuals or at improving their behaviour and skills. Furthermore, the role of support staff in the implementation of interventions was either active, assisting or undefined.

Conclusions: This overview of studies could contribute to the existing body of knowledge and help to optimise psychosocial support for a growing population.

Keywords: ageing; intellectual disability; psychosocial interventions; support; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare not to have any conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flowchart of the study selection for this systematic review

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alftberg, Å. , Johansson, M. , & Ahlstrom, G. (2021). Ambivalence among staff regarding ageing with intellectual disabilities: Experiences and reflections. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 25(2), 192–209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. * Anderson, G. , & Kazantzis, N. (2008). Social problem‐solving skills training for adults with mild intellectual disability: A multiple case study. Behaviour Change, 25(2), 97–108.
    1. Andrews, F. M. , & Withey, S. B. (1976). Social indicators of well being. New York: Plenum Press.
    1. Axmon, A. , Ahlström, G. , & Höglund, P. (2017). Prevalence and treatment of diabetes mellitus and hypertension among older adults with intellectual disability in comparison with the general population. BMC Geriatrics, 17, 272. - PMC - PubMed
    1. * Bai, X. , Ho, D. W. H. , Fung, K. , Tang, L. , He, M. , Young, K. W. , & Kwok, T. (2014). Effectiveness of a life story work program on older adults with intellectual disabilities. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 9, 1865–1872. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types