Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 16;7(4):e22140.
doi: 10.2196/22140.

Technology-Based Interventions for Cancer Caregivers: Concept Analysis

Zhaohui Su  1 , Xiaoshan Li  2 , Dean McDonnell  3 , Andrea A Fernandez  4 , Bertha E Flores  4 , Jing Wang  5
Affiliations

Technology-Based Interventions for Cancer Caregivers: Concept Analysis

Zhaohui Su et al. JMIR Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Cancer is a taxing chronic disease that demands substantial care, most of which is shouldered by informal caregivers. As a result, cancer caregivers often have to manage considerable challenges that could result in severe physical and psychological health consequences. Technology-based interventions have the potential to address many, if not all, of the obstacles caregivers encounter while caring for patients with cancer. However, although the application of technology-based interventions is on the rise, the term is seldom defined in research or practice. Considering that the lack of conceptual clarity of the term could compromise the effectiveness of technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers, timely research is needed to bridge this gap.

Objective: This study aims to clarify the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provide a definition that can be used by cancer caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based research and practice.

Methods: The 8-step concept analysis method by Walker and Avant was used to analyze the concept of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving. PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies that examined technology-based interventions for cancer caregivers.

Results: The defining attributes of technology-based interventions were recognized as being accessible, affordable, convenient, and user-friendly. On the basis of insights gained on the defining attributes, antecedents to, and consequences of technology-based interventions through the concept analysis process, technology-based interventions were defined as the use of technology to design, develop, and deliver health promotion contents and strategies aimed at inducing or improving positive physical or psychological health outcomes in cancer caregivers.

Conclusions: This study clarified the meaning of technology-based interventions in the context of cancer caregiving and provided a clear definition that can be used by caregivers, patients, clinicians, and researchers to facilitate evidence-based oncology practice. A clear conceptualization of technology-based interventions lays foundations for better intervention design and research outcomes, which in turn have the potential to help health care professionals address the needs and preferences of cancer caregivers more cost-effectively.

Keywords: cancer; caregivers; concept analysis; mobile phone; oncology; technology-based interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A framework of subgroups of technology-based interventions with cancer caregivers as the target audience.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A schematic representation of the concept analysis procedures adopted in the study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Data screening and analysis flowchart.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A schematic representation of the technology-based intervention attributes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Areia NP, Fonseca G, Major S, Relvas AP. Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: prevalence and predictors. Pall Supp Care. 2018 Feb 26;17(03):286–93. doi: 10.1017/s1478951518000044. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen L, Dauphin S, De Burghgraeve T, Schoenmakers B, Buntinx F, van den Akker M. Caregiver burden: an increasing problem related to an aging cancer population. J Health Psychol. 2021 Sep 09;26(11):1833–49. doi: 10.1177/1359105319893019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kale HP, Carroll NV. Self-reported financial burden of cancer care and its effect on physical and mental health-related quality of life among US cancer survivors. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15;122(8):283–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29808. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29808. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chino F, Peppercorn J, Taylor DH, Lu Y, Samsa G, Abernethy AP, Zafar SY. Self-reported financial burden and satisfaction with care among patients with cancer. Oncologist. 2014 Apr;19(4):414–20. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0374. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0374.theoncologist.2013-0374 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed