Evaluating Strength of Evidence of Pediatric Otolaryngology Research Literature: A 20-Year Review
- PMID: 34784065
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.29945
Evaluating Strength of Evidence of Pediatric Otolaryngology Research Literature: A 20-Year Review
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Quantity and quality of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OTL-HNS) research are increasing, yet patterns within Pediatric OTL-HNS publications are unknown. This study examines trends in the level of evidence of pediatric OTL-HNS articles over a 20-year period to quantify the growth and characterize contributing factors.
Study design: Review article.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 12 peer-reviewed OTL-HNS journals at three time-points: 1996, 2006, and 2016. Pediatric-specific OTL-HNS journals were selected; all were among the top 10 highest impact factor journals, with one pediatric-specific and one Canadian journal. Publication details, author characteristics, and study focus were collected. Papers were classified based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence by two independent reviewers.
Results: Of the 1,733 articles reviewed, 727 met inclusion criteria. A greater absolute number of pediatric OTL-HNS articles were published over the years studied: from 95 in 1996 to 359 in 2016 (P < .001). As well, the absolute number of high-quality studies has increased over the study period, from 28 articles in 1996 to 100 articles in 2016. However, the relative percentage of high-quality papers remained stable between 27.9% and 32.2% with an average of 29.7% (P = .89). Higher impact factor journals did not tend to publish higher-quality pediatric OTL-HNS articles (P = .48).
Conclusions: Over the past 20 years, there is no appreciable improvement in the proportion of high-quality publications in pediatric OTL-HNS; however, there is an overall greater number of high-quality papers within OTL-HNS literature. These findings likely relate to challenges of research within pediatric surgical specialties.
Level of evidence: NA Laryngoscope, 132:1869-1876, 2022.
Keywords: Level of evidence; pediatric otolaryngology; quality.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Tsay MY, Yang YH. Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials. J Med Libr Assoc 2005;93:450-458.
-
- Hoffmann T, Erueti C, Thorning S, Glasziou P. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties. BMJ 2012;344:e3223.
-
- Bagues M, Sylos-Labini M, Zinovyeva N. A walk on the wild side: “predatory” journals and information asymmetries in scientific evaluations. Res Policy 2019;48:462-477.
-
- Chung KH, Cox RAK, Kim KA. On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: evidence from the finance academe. Q Rev Econ Finance 2009;49:893-916.
-
- Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008;248:189-198.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
