Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy: Three-year extension study
- PMID: 34785411
- DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108407
Long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy: Three-year extension study
Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy.
Methods: This retrospective study represented the 3-year extension phase of a multicenter, open-label, phase 4, prospective study of perampanel as a first add-on therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. Seizure and safety outcomes were assessed annually from the start of the extension study, and the retention rate was calculated from the start of perampanel exposure in the original study.
Results: The 50% responder and seizure freedom rates were 84.8% and 58.7%, respectively, during the third year and 71.7% and 32.6%, respectively, during the entire 3-year period of the extension study. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year retention rates were 62.5%, 53.1%, and 52.1%, respectively. Efficacies were higher in patients that were aged >55 years, male, and receiving ≤4 mg of perampanel. Perampanel was generally well tolerated; 47.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the 3 years of extension (46 adverse events (AEs) in 35 patients). The most common AEs were dizziness (33.8%), somnolence (5.4%), anger (4.1%), and irritability (4.1%). AEs were resolved with perampanel dose reduction or discontinuation in 10 (13.5%) and 12 (16.2%) patients, respectively.
Conclusion: Long-term treatment with perampanel as a first add-on therapy did not raise new safety signals in patients with focal epilepsy. Especially at low perampanel doses (≤4 mg/day), sustained improvement in seizure control was achieved, which could potentially avoid adverse drug reactions.
Keywords: Efficacy; Epilepsy; Perampanel; Responder rate; Retention rate; Safety.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest Ji Woong Lee is an employee of Eisai Korea Inc. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this study.
Comment in
-
Reply to: "Perampanel and pregnancy: Could experience be a gloomy lantern that does not even illuminate its bearer?".Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Apr;129:108608. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108608. Epub 2022 Feb 15. Epilepsy Behav. 2022. PMID: 35181218 No abstract available.
-
Response to "Perampanel and pregnancy: Could experience be a gloomy lantern that does not even illuminate its bearer?".Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Apr;129:108654. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108654. Epub 2022 Mar 16. Epilepsy Behav. 2022. PMID: 35305920 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources