Gestational weight gain trajectories in GARBH-Ini pregnancy cohort in North India and a comparative analysis with global references
- PMID: 34785811
- DOI: 10.1038/s41430-021-01040-y
Gestational weight gain trajectories in GARBH-Ini pregnancy cohort in North India and a comparative analysis with global references
Abstract
Background: To describe the pattern of gestational weight gain (GWG), derive reference centiles for GWG specific to North Indian population, and to compare the weight gain across different periods of gestation with the INTERGROWTH-21st reference.
Methods: A prospective pregnancy (GARBH-Ini) cohort was initiated and followed between May 2015 and June 2019 in a district hospital, Gurguram, North India. GWG centile curves were modelled by Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape method (n = 2844) and compared with INTERGROWTH-21st reference. The independent association of GWG with biological and social predictors was assessed using multivariable regression analysis.
Results: Percentiles (3rd, 10th, 50th, 90th and 97th) for each completed week from 18-40 weeks of gestation were derived from smoothed centile curves. The median GWG across pregnancy during specific antenatal visits was 1.29 at 18, 4.44 at 26, 5.8 at 30 and 9.06 kg at 40 weeks of gestation. Nearly 26% of participants had GWG < 10th centile at 18-20 weeks as per INTERGROWTH-21st reference and this increased to 45% at delivery. Significant predictors of GWG included maternal age, height, first trimester body mass index, parity, type of family, and use of clean fuel for cooking.
Conclusion: These GWG percentiles will serve as a useful reference, particularly during the WHO recommended antenatal visit schedule for optimum pregnancy outcomes, for clinicians and researchers. Multiple independent biological and social predictors of GWG suggest that single interventions are unlikely to bridge the gap between general Indian population and international references.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Comment in
-
Should local references or global standards be used to assess gestational weight gain?Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Jul;77(7):762-763. doi: 10.1038/s41430-022-01202-6. Epub 2022 Sep 8. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023. PMID: 36076066 No abstract available.
-
The challenges in gestational weight gain monitoring in low and middle income settings.Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023 Jul;77(7):764-765. doi: 10.1038/s41430-023-01292-w. Epub 2023 Jun 14. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37316558 No abstract available.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine (US) and National Research Council (US) Committee to Reexamine IOM Pregnancy Weight Guidelines. Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines [Internet]. Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009 [cited 2019 Jul 25]. (The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32813/ .
-
- Cheikh Ismail L, Bishop DC, Pang R, Ohuma EO, Kac G, Abrams B, et al. Gestational weight gain standards based on women enrolled in the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMJ. 2016;i555.
-
- Arora P, Tamber Aeri B. Gestational Weight Gain among Healthy Pregnant Women from Asia in Comparison with Institute of Medicine (IOM) Guidelines-2009: A Systematic Review. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019(Mar):1–10. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous