Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Nov 11;55(6):1417-1427.
doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00525-z. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Principles of Bracing in the Early Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Affiliations
Review

Principles of Bracing in the Early Management of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Rajiv Merchant et al. Indian J Orthop. .

Abstract

Bracing is considered a gold standard in treating Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) in infants under 6 months of age with reducible hips. A variety of braces are available that work on similar principles of limiting hip adduction and extension. This paper summarises the current evidence regarding bracing in DDH. Most of the literature pertains to the Pavlik harness (PH) and there are few studies for other brace types. Bracing eliminates dislocating forces from the hamstrings, the block to reduction of the psoas and improves the muscle line of pull to stabilise the hip joint. Recent studies have shown no benefit in bracing for stable dysplasia. The rates of PH treatment failure in Ortolani-positive hips have been reported to be high. Barlow positive hips have lower Graf grades and are more amenable to PH treatment. There is consensus that the earlier the diagnosis of DDH and initiation of PH treatment, the better the outcome. Failure rates due to unsuccessful reduction and AVN are higher with treatment initiated after age 4-6 months. Studies have shown no benefits of staged weaning of braces. While there is no maximum time in brace, current consensus suggests a minimum of 6 weeks. The key to successful bracing lies in education and communication with the family.

Keywords: Abduction Brace; Brace; DDH; Pavlik Harness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestOn behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Commonly used DDH braces
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative images of the 4 different Graf Ultrasound grades (a = Graf I, b = Graf II, c = Graf III, d = Graf IV)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative image of Morin’s Ratio/Femoral Head Coverage Index
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ultrasound image showing a Barlow positive hip subluxating
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
RNOH Stanmore post brace/harness and operative treatment follow-up schedule

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ramsey PL, Lasser S, MacEwen GD. Congenital dislocation of the hip. Use of the Pavlik harness in the child during the first six months of life. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1976;58(7):1000–1004. - PubMed
    1. Sewell MD, Eastwood DM. Screening and treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip-where do we go from here? International Orthopaedics. 2011;35(9):1359–1367. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pavone V, de Cristo C, Vescio A, Lucenti L, Sapienza M, Sessa G, et al. Dynamic and Static Splinting for Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review. Children. 2021 doi: 10.3390/children8020104. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graf R. Classification of hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 1984;102:248–255. - PubMed
    1. Graf R. Hip sonography: 20 years experience and results. Hip International. 2007;17(SUPPL. 5):8–14. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources