Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov 6:14:1833-1846.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S327759. eCollection 2021.

Effects of Leader-Follower Extraversion Congruence and Sectoral Difference on Leader-Member Exchange: A Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Effects of Leader-Follower Extraversion Congruence and Sectoral Difference on Leader-Member Exchange: A Cross-Sectional Study

Qishan Chen et al. Psychol Res Behav Manag. .

Abstract

Purpose: Drawing upon self-categorization theory and the comparative literature on public and private sectors, the purpose of this study is to examine whether leader-follower extraversion congruence is positively related to leader-member exchange (LMX) and whether congruence at high levels of extraversion results in higher LMX than congruence at low levels. Furthermore, the study aims to investigate the moderating role of sectoral difference in the relationship between extraversion fit and LMX.

Methods: Participants were 320 leader-follower dyads (53 leaders and 320 followers) from various public and private sectors in the Chinese cultural context. The extraversion part of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and leader-member exchange multidimensional measure (LMX-MDM) were used to measure extraversion and LMX, respectively. Hypotheses were tested using cross-level moderated polynomial regression and response surface analysis.

Results: Leader-follower extraversion congruence was not significantly associated with LMX, and there was no significant difference in LMX between congruence at high levels of extraversion and congruence at low levels. However, sectoral difference moderated the relationship between extraversion fit and LMX. Specifically, in the public sector, leader-follower extraversion congruence was positively related to LMX, and LMX was higher when leader and follower extraversion were both at a high level compared to when they were at a low level. In the private sector, this fit effect vanished.

Practical implications: The results suggest that, in the public sector, when organizations deal with the deployment of staff, taking leader-follower extraversion fit into account may mitigate possible later relationship conflicts. However, in the private sector, by not emphasizing extraversion fit, organizations can focus resources on more crucial factors.

Originality/value: By considering sectoral difference as the boundary condition of leader-follower extraversion fit, this study extends the comparative literature on public and private sectors and supports self-categorization theory.

Keywords: leader-follower extraversion; leader-member exchange; sectoral difference; self-categorization theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The conceptual model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated surface relating follower and leader extraversion with LMX.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Estimated surface relating follower and leader extraversion with LMX in the public sector.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Estimated surface relating follower and leader extraversion with LMX in the private sector.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Judge TA, Bono JE, Remus I, Gerhardt MW. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87(4):765–780. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spark A, Stansmore T, O’Connor P. The failure of introverts to emerge as leaders: the role of forecasted affect. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;121:84–88. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.026 - DOI
    1. Bono JE, Judge TA. Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):901–910. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.901 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA. Reversing the extraverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(3):528–550. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.61968043 - DOI
    1. Ployhart RE, Lim BC, Chan KY. Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five factor model of personality. Pers Psychol. 2010;54(4):809–843. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00233.x - DOI