Effect of targeted therapy and immunotherapy on advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer outcomes in the real world
- PMID: 34786889
- PMCID: PMC8704182
- DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4427
Effect of targeted therapy and immunotherapy on advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer outcomes in the real world
Abstract
The evolution of diagnosis and treatment of advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to increasing the use of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The study goal was to assess the effect of molecular testing and the introduction of new therapies on overall survival (OS). All patients with stage IV NSCLC referred to BC Cancer were included in the study. Four 1-year time cohorts were created based on molecular testing implementation and funded drug availability: C1 baseline (2009), C2 EGFR TKI access (2011), C3 ALK inhibitor access (2015), C4 immunotherapy availability (2017). Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and systemic therapy details were collected retrospectively. OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. There were 3421 patients identified with stage IV NSCLC and 1319 (39%) received systemic therapy. In the four 1-year time cohorts C1/C2/C3/C4: driver mutation-targeted treatment increased 1/17/27/34% (of total systemic therapy), as did treatment with any line immunotherapy <1/1/9/38%. Median OS with best supportive care (BSC) was 3.4/3.1/3.2/2.9 m (p = 0.16) and with systemic treatment 9.9/10.9/13.9/15.0 m (p < 0.001). Median OS by treatment exposure was BSC 3.1 m, chemotherapy only 7.3 m, targeted therapy 17.5 m, and immunotherapy 20.7 m. In our real-world study, following the introduction of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, there was a significant improvement in OS in each successive time cohort concordant with advancements in therapeutic options.
Keywords: chemotherapy; immunotherapy; medical oncology; nonsmall-cell lung cancer; targeted therapy.
© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Pender reports receiving personal fees from Guardant Health and Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work; Ms. Leung reports receiving personal fees from Takeda Canada, outside the submitted work; and Dr. Ho reports receiving grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, and Roche, and personal fees from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck, Novartis, and Takeda Canada, all outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209‐249. - PubMed
-
- Mok TS, Wu Y‐L, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin‐paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:947‐957. - PubMed
-
- Yang J‐H, Wu Y‐L, Schuler M, et al. Afatinib versus cisplatin‐based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation‐positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX‐Lung 3 and LUX‐Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:141‐151. - PubMed
-
- Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, et al. First‐line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK‐positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2167‐2177. - PubMed
-
- Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, et al. Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK‐positive non‐small‐cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:829‐838. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous