Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):456-467.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0475.

Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review

Affiliations
Review

Single-use flexible ureteroscopes: update and perspective in developing countries. A narrative review

Eduardo Mazzucchi et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun.

Abstract

Flexible ureteroscopy is a well-established method for treatment of urinary stones but flexible ureteroscopes are expensive and fragile devices with a very limited lifetime. Since 2006 with the advent of digital flexible ureteroscopes a great evolution has occurred. The first single-use flexible ureteroscope was launched in 2011 and new models are coming to the market. The aim of this article is to review the characteristics of these devices, compare their results with the reusable devices and evaluate the cost-benefits of adopting single-use flexible ureteroscopes in developing countries.

Materials and methods: an extensive review of articles listed at PubMed and published between 2000 and 2021 was performed.

Results: Single-use flexible ureteroscopes have a shaft with 65 to 68cm length and weight between 119 and 277g. Their deflection goes up to 300 degrees. Their stone-free rates vary between 60 and 95% which is comparable to reusable scopes and operative times ranges from 54 to 86 minutes which are lower when compared to reusable flexible scopes. Their costs vary between 800 and 3180 US dollars.

Conclusion: single-use flexible ureteroscopes are lighter and have superior quality of image when compared to fiberoptic ones. There are no definite data showing a higher stone-free rate or less complications with the use of single-use flexible ureteroscopes. Each institution must perform a cost-benefit analysis before making the decision of adopting or not such devices depending on the local circumstances.

Keywords: Meta-Analysis [Publication Type]; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Ureteroscopes; Kidney Calculi.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of evidence acquisition in a review on single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscopy.
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the different types of single-use flexible ureteroscopes.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wright AE, Rukin NJ, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy and stones: Current status and future expectations. World J Nephrol. 2014; 3:243-8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emiliani E, Mercadé A, Millan F, Sánchez-Martín F, Konstantinidis CA, Angerri O. First clinical evaluation of the new single-use flexible and semirigid Pusen ureteroscopes. Cent European J Urol. 2018; 71:208-13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Torricelli FCM, Monga M. Staghorn renal stones: what the urologist needs to know. Int Braz J Urol. 2020; 46:927-33. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Young HH, McKay RW. Congenital valvular obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1929; 48: 509–12.
    1. Marshall VF. Fiber optics in urology. J Urol. 1964; 91:110-4. - PubMed