Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;32(10):837-842.
doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.20372.

Almost One-Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography

Manish Singla  1 , Jean D Kemp  2 , Michael E Goldberg  3 , Vito V Cirigliano  4 , Gilda M Bobele  5 , Ganesh R Veerappan  6 , Patrick E Young  7
Affiliations

Almost One-Third of Large Sessile Serrated Polyps Are Missed on CT Colonography

Manish Singla et al. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Nearly one-third of colorectal cancers (CRC) arise via the serrated pathway. CT colonography (CTC) is a CRC screening examination. Endoscopic detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) varies widely; it is unknown whether CTC effectively detects SSPs. The aim of this study is to determine whether CTC detects SSPs at an institution that performs a large volume of CTC.

Methods: We conducted a search of pathology records to identify serrated polyps (SPs) from 2005 to 2012. We extracted demographic data from the electronic health records (EHRs) of subjects with an SSP and examined endoscopy reports for location and size of each SSP. We identified subjects with a CTC within 1 year prior to the colonoscopy that found an SSP, and determined if the CTC identified the SSP.

Results: Our search found 3978 subjects with SP over the 7-year period. Seven hundred thirty-two subjects had at least 1 SSP. Eightytwo subjects had CTC done within 1 year prior to the colonoscopy that identified SSP. Seventy-nine subjects' polyps were identified on CTC. CT colonography was done an average of 38 ± 54 days prior to colonoscopy. One hundred fifteen SSPs were identified endoscopically. A total of 48.7% of all SSPs were identified via CTC; larger SSPs were more likely to be seen on CTC (P < .001), and 69.6% of SSPs larger than 10 mm were found via CTC. Proximal SSPs were more often identified than distal SSPs (P = .005).

Conclusion: Given the miss rate for SSPs on CTC, endoscopists should be vigilant about examining the proximal colon in subjects referred after CTC, even if the imaging does not reveal a proximal polyp.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Larger sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) were more likely to be found on CT colonography (CTC) than smaller SSPs (P = .001). Sessile serrated polyps were found at lower rates on CTC than tubular adenomas (TAs) of the same size.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proximal SSPs were more likely to be found on CTC than distal SSPs (P = .023).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. American Cancer Society. Colorectal Cancer Facts Figures 2014-2016. 2014.
    1. Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61(5):759–767.. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goldstein NS, Bhanot P, Odish E, Hunter S. Hyperplastic-like colon polyps that preceded microsatellite-unstable adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;119(6):778–796.. 10.1309/DRFQ-0WFU-F1G1-3CTK) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jass JR. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology. 2007;50(1):113–130.. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02549.x) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1570–1595.. 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002) - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms