United States Emergency Department Use of Medications with Pharmacogenetic Recommendations
- PMID: 34787561
- PMCID: PMC8597689
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2021.5.51248
United States Emergency Department Use of Medications with Pharmacogenetic Recommendations
Abstract
Introduction: Emergency departments (ED) use many medications with a range of therapeutic efficacy and potential significant side effects, and many medications have dosage adjustment recommendations based on the patient's specific genotype. How frequently medications with such pharmaco-genetic recommendations are used in United States (US) EDs has not been studied.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2010-2015 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS). We reported the proportion of ED visits in which at least one medication with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) recommendation of Level A or B evidence was ordered. Secondary comparisons included distributions and 95% confidence intervals of age, gender, race/ethnicity, ED disposition, geographical region, immediacy, and insurance status between all ED visits and those involving a CPIC medication.
Results: From 165,155 entries representing 805,726,000 US ED visits in the 2010-2015 NHAMCS, 148,243,000 ED visits (18.4%) led to orders of CPIC medications. The most common CPIC medication was tramadol (6.3%). Visits involving CPIC medications had higher proportions of patients who were female, had private insurance and self-pay, and were discharged from the ED. They also involved lower proportions of patients with Medicare and Medicaid.
Conclusion: Almost one fifth of US ED visits involve a medication with a pharmacogenetic recommendation that may impact the efficacy and toxicity for individual patients. While direct application of genotyping is still in development, it is important for emergency care providers to understand and support this technology given its potential to improve individualized, patient-centered care.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Changes in insurance status and emergency department visits after the 2008 economic downturn.Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;22(1):73-80. doi: 10.1111/acem.12553. Epub 2014 Dec 24. Acad Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 25545581
-
Trends in Emergency Department Use by Rural and Urban Populations in the United States.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Apr 5;2(4):e191919. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1919. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 30977849 Free PMC article.
-
Untapped Potential for Emergency Department Observation Unit Use: A National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Study.West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 18;23(2):134-140. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.52231. West J Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35302444 Free PMC article.
-
A cross-sectional study of emergency department boarding practices in the United States.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):497-503. doi: 10.1111/acem.12375. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 24842499
-
Use of a National Database to Assess Pediatric Emergency Care Across United States Emergency Departments.Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1355-1364. doi: 10.1111/acem.13489. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Acad Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29858524
References
-
- Dean L, Kane M, Pratt VM, et al. Medical Genetics Summaries. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information; 2012. Tramadol therapy and CYP2D6 genotype. - PubMed